PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQP.DE vs. ASRM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQP.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQP.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IQQP.DE

1D
0.73%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
2.55%
6M
4.05%
1Y
0.10%
3Y*
13.75%
5Y*
-3.96%
10Y*
1.18%

ASRM.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQP.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IQQP.DE
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF
2.55%8.57%-0.80%17.79%-33.87%
ASRM.DE
BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%8.14%7.64%-19.32%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQP.DE and ASRM.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022

0.56

The correlation between IQQP.DE and ASRM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQP.DE vs. ASRM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQP.DE
IQQP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
IQQP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

ASRM.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQP.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQP.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQQP.DEASRM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.02

IQQP.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQQP.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQP.DEASRM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.25%

Volatility

IQQP.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQP.DEASRM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.30%

IQQP.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IQQP.DE and ASRM.DE have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

IQQP.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, while ASRM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASRM.DE
BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQQP.DE
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF
2.84%2.89%2.75%2.65%4.34%2.07%2.64%2.92%3.33%2.83%2.61%2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQP.DE and ASRM.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IQQP.DE and ASRM.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

IQQP.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe ex UK Dividend+, while ASRM.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNP Paribas.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQP.DE and ASRM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer