PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQN.DE vs. EUNA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQN.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (IQQN.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQN.DE achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.46% return.


IQQN.DE

1D
-0.05%
1M
4.42%
YTD
11.09%
6M
10.54%
1Y
24.97%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
13.97%
10Y*
14.38%

EUNA.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
-0.46%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
1.32%
3Y*
2.28%
5Y*
-1.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQN.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQQN.DE
iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF
11.09%4.95%31.43%22.31%-15.50%38.10%8.53%34.21%-2.31%-0.47%
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.46%2.79%1.60%4.36%-13.52%-2.37%3.70%5.06%-1.17%-0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQN.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017

-0.00

The correlation between IQQN.DE and EUNA.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQN.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQN.DE
IQQN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IQQN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNA.DE
EUNA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQN.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (IQQN.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQN.DEEUNA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.06

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

0.43

+3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.25

1.18

+11.07

IQQN.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQN.DE and EUNA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQN.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

0.34

+1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

-0.28

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

-0.05

+0.64

Drawdowns

IQQN.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQN.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.40%, which is greater than EUNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQN.DE and EUNA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQN.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.40%

-17.79%

-34.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-2.75%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.46%

-4.02%

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.46%

-17.03%

-6.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-8.66%

+8.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-6.76%

-2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

0.99%

+1.06%

Volatility

IQQN.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (IQQN.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) at 1.35%. This indicates that IQQN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQN.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

1.35%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

2.82%

+4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

3.46%

+8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.24%

4.64%

+10.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

4.27%

+11.82%

IQQN.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQN.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQN.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQN.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while EUNA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQQN.DE
iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF
0.61%0.68%0.75%0.99%1.15%0.73%1.09%1.22%1.42%1.34%1.37%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQN.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IQQN.DE.

IQQN.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EUNA.DE is Global Bonds. IQQN.DE tracks MSCI North America, while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IQQN.DE and 0.10% for EUNA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQN.DE and EUNA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer