PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQK.DE vs. XCS3.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQK.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQK.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Malaysia UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS3.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQK.DE achieves a 76.68% return, which is significantly higher than XCS3.DE's 7.13% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQK.DE has outperformed XCS3.DE with an annualized return of 14.05%, while XCS3.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 1.83% annualized return.


IQQK.DE

1D
-3.11%
1M
-17.96%
6M
57.63%
YTD
76.68%
1Y
146.35%
3Y*
37.87%
5Y*
15.71%
10Y*
14.05%

XCS3.DE

1D
0.31%
1M
1.75%
6M
3.40%
YTD
7.13%
1Y
23.98%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
1.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQK.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQQK.DE
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)
76.68%77.57%-18.00%15.63%-24.03%-0.92%30.76%14.54%-18.10%28.00%
XCS3.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Malaysia UCITS ETF (Acc)
7.13%3.11%26.75%-7.60%1.23%-1.02%-6.99%1.63%-1.88%9.03%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQK.DE and XCS3.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2011

0.49

The correlation between IQQK.DE and XCS3.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQK.DE vs. XCS3.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQK.DE
IQQK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IQQK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

XCS3.DE
XCS3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XCS3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQK.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQK.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Malaysia UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS3.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQQK.DEXCS3.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.29

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.54

3.04

+3.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.16

8.22

+11.94

IQQK.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.34, which is higher than the XCS3.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQK.DE and XCS3.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQQK.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQK.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.01%, which is greater than XCS3.DE's maximum drawdown of -43.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQK.DE and XCS3.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQK.DEXCS3.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.01%

-43.32%

-24.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.26%

-7.85%

-14.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.43%

-21.83%

-8.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.34%

-21.83%

-18.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.03%

-35.49%

-6.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.26%

-3.55%

-18.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.79%

-17.42%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.23%

2.91%

+4.32%

Volatility

IQQK.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQK.DE) has a higher volatility of 19.75% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Malaysia UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS3.DE) at 3.83%. This indicates that IQQK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCS3.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQK.DEXCS3.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.75%

3.83%

+15.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.26%

10.87%

+28.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.60%

14.00%

+29.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.50%

13.14%

+14.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.74%

15.01%

+10.73%

IQQK.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQK.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XCS3.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQK.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQK.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, while XCS3.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQK.DE
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.49%0.85%1.28%1.14%1.41%1.33%0.77%1.26%1.09%0.74%0.63%0.44%
XCS3.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Malaysia UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQK.DE and XCS3.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCS3.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCS3.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQK.DE.

IQQK.DE is categorized as South Korea Equities, while XCS3.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. IQQK.DE tracks MSCI Korea 20/35, while XCS3.DE tracks MSCI Malaysia Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQK.DE and 0.50% for XCS3.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQK.DE and XCS3.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer