PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQJ.DE vs. JNHD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQJ.DE vs. JNHD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQJ.DE) and Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (JNHD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQJ.DE achieves a 16.64% return, which is significantly lower than JNHD.DE's 20.87% return.


IQQJ.DE

1D
-1.02%
1M
-0.84%
6M
10.19%
YTD
16.64%
1Y
36.38%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
9.63%
10Y*
8.53%

JNHD.DE

1D
-1.07%
1M
0.64%
6M
13.68%
YTD
20.87%
1Y
49.88%
3Y*
27.17%
5Y*
19.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQJ.DE vs. JNHD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IQQJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)
16.64%12.73%13.56%15.99%-12.77%9.56%9.85%
JNHD.DE
Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
20.87%27.52%23.21%32.66%-7.11%11.87%12.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQJ.DE and JNHD.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020

0.83

The correlation between IQQJ.DE and JNHD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (5 years) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQJ.DE vs. JNHD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQJ.DE
IQQJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IQQJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

JNHD.DE
JNHD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
JNHD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNHD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNHD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
JNHD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNHD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQJ.DE vs. JNHD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQJ.DE) and Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (JNHD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQQJ.DEJNHD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

5.16

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.50

17.07

-5.57

IQQJ.DE vs. JNHD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the JNHD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQJ.DE and JNHD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQQJ.DE vs. JNHD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.48%, which is greater than JNHD.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQJ.DE and JNHD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQJ.DEJNHD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.48%

-21.83%

-30.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-9.62%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.72%

-21.83%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.38%

-21.83%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.86%

-3.25%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-4.16%

-12.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.91%

+0.24%

Volatility

IQQJ.DE vs. JNHD.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQJ.DE) and Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (JNHD.DE) have volatilities of 6.59% and 6.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQJ.DEJNHD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.59%

6.77%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.09%

16.28%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.68%

20.83%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

18.86%

-2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.43%

18.39%

-1.96%

IQQJ.DE vs. JNHD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQJ.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than JNHD.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IQQJ.DE vs. JNHD.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than JNHD.DE's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQQJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.59%1.79%1.48%1.42%1.76%1.16%1.40%1.41%1.44%1.23%
JNHD.DE
Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
1.50%1.82%1.85%1.72%2.52%1.83%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IQQJ.DE and JNHD.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IQQJ.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IQQJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JNHD.DE.

IQQJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan, while JNHD.DE tracks MSCI Japan Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IQQJ.DE and 0.20% for JNHD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQJ.DE and JNHD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer