IQQJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE
IQQJ.DE (iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)) and EUNA.DE (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IQQJ.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan, while EUNA.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQQJ.DE returned 9.84%/yr vs -1.29%/yr for EUNA.DE. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQQJ.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EUNA.DE.
Performance
IQQJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQJ.DE achieves a 16.83% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.46% return.
IQQJ.DE
- 1D
- -14.69%
- 1M
- 3.60%
- YTD
- 16.83%
- 6M
- 16.82%
- 1Y
- 31.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.94%
EUNA.DE
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 1.32%
- 3Y*
- 2.28%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- —
IQQJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQJ.DE iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 16.83% | 12.69% | 13.58% | 16.03% | -12.77% | 9.53% | 4.77% | 21.88% | -10.11% | -0.94% |
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.46% | 2.79% | 1.60% | 4.36% | -13.52% | -2.37% | 3.70% | 5.06% | -1.17% | -0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQJ.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, IQQJ.DE and EUNA.DE have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQJ.DE
EUNA.DE
IQQJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQJ.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQJ.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.06 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 0.43 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.16 | 1.18 | +7.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQJ.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.34 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | -0.28 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | -0.05 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
IQQJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.99%, which is greater than EUNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQJ.DE and EUNA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQJ.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.99% | -17.79% | -37.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.69% | -2.75% | -11.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.72% | -4.02% | -12.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.40% | -17.03% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.69% | -8.66% | -6.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.84% | -6.76% | -10.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 0.99% | +2.34% |
Volatility
IQQJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 30.30% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) at 1.35%. This indicates that IQQJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQJ.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.30% | 1.35% | +28.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.04% | 2.82% | +30.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.82% | 3.46% | +31.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 4.64% | +16.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 4.27% | +14.55% |
IQQJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQJ.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IQQJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while EUNA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQJ.DE iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.52% | 1.79% | 1.48% | 1.42% | 1.76% | 1.16% | 1.40% | 1.41% | 1.44% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQJ.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for IQQJ.DE.
IQQJ.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while EUNA.DE is Global Bonds. IQQJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan, while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IQQJ.DE and 0.10% for EUNA.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQJ.DE and EUNA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer