PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQI.DE vs. XDEV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQI.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQI.DE achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly lower than XDEV.DE's 35.07% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQI.DE has underperformed XDEV.DE with an annualized return of 6.89%, while XDEV.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.35% annualized return.


IQQI.DE

1D
-1.37%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
10.36%
6M
9.16%
1Y
13.12%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
6.89%

XDEV.DE

1D
-0.89%
1M
11.02%
YTD
35.07%
6M
38.05%
1Y
63.16%
3Y*
26.76%
5Y*
17.35%
10Y*
12.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQI.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQQI.DE
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF
10.36%0.54%14.51%-3.16%-0.37%26.96%-10.83%27.76%2.20%0.70%
XDEV.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C
35.07%24.76%11.62%15.67%-4.96%30.90%-12.53%22.09%-10.42%7.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQI.DE and XDEV.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2014

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between IQQI.DE and XDEV.DE has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQI.DE vs. XDEV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQI.DE
IQQI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IQQI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEV.DE
XDEV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XDEV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQI.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQI.DEXDEV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.81

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

10.38

-7.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.21

39.12

-32.91

IQQI.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the XDEV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQI.DE and XDEV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQI.DEXDEV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

4.52

-3.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

1.23

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.78

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.71

-0.37

Drawdowns

IQQI.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQI.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.25%, which is greater than XDEV.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQI.DE and XDEV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQI.DEXDEV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.25%

-35.28%

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.81%

-6.05%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.76%

-18.02%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.81%

-18.02%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.15%

-35.28%

+1.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.21%

-1.07%

-2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.06%

-5.56%

-5.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

1.61%

+0.37%

Volatility

IQQI.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE) is 3.88%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that IQQI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQI.DEXDEV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

5.77%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.71%

11.20%

-2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.48%

13.89%

-3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.70%

13.96%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.23%

15.90%

-1.67%

IQQI.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQI.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEV.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQI.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, while XDEV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQI.DE
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF
2.09%2.30%2.28%2.42%2.14%1.85%2.25%2.05%2.30%2.76%2.64%3.14%
XDEV.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQI.DE and XDEV.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEV.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEV.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQI.DE.

IQQI.DE tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index, while XDEV.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IQQI.DE and 0.25% for XDEV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQI.DE and XDEV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer