PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQ7.DE vs. H4ZL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQ7.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ7.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQ7.DE achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than H4ZL.DE's 6.32% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQ7.DE has outperformed H4ZL.DE with an annualized return of 4.47%, while H4ZL.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 2.35% annualized return.


IQQ7.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
14.24%
6M
13.41%
1Y
12.16%
3Y*
7.46%
5Y*
4.46%
10Y*
4.47%

H4ZL.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
6.32%
6M
5.97%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
3.13%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
2.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQ7.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQQ7.DE
iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF
14.24%-9.38%10.73%9.18%-19.53%54.15%-19.20%24.58%-0.68%-8.23%
H4ZL.DE
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD
6.32%-4.65%2.27%6.12%-20.22%36.90%-16.99%23.91%-0.81%-2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQ7.DE and H4ZL.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2013

0.90

The correlation between IQQ7.DE and H4ZL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQ7.DE vs. H4ZL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQ7.DE
IQQ7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IQQ7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQ7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQ7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQ7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQ7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZL.DE
H4ZL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
H4ZL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQ7.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ7.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQ7.DEH4ZL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.11

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

0.84

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.13

2.48

+1.65

IQQ7.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQ7.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the H4ZL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQ7.DE and H4ZL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQ7.DEH4ZL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.59

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.02

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.14

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.29

-0.08

Drawdowns

IQQ7.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQ7.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.97%, which is greater than H4ZL.DE's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ7.DE and H4ZL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQ7.DEH4ZL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.97%

-41.97%

-27.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.13%

-7.82%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.01%

-20.68%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.10%

-30.45%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.21%

-41.97%

-3.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.01%

-13.81%

+8.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.82%

-10.80%

-4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

2.67%

+0.25%

Volatility

IQQ7.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ7.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE) at 2.88%. This indicates that IQQ7.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than H4ZL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQ7.DEH4ZL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

2.88%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.99%

8.34%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

11.21%

+1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

14.69%

+2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.09%

16.27%

+3.82%

IQQ7.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQ7.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZL.DE's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQ7.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQ7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, while H4ZL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H4ZL.DE
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.63%3.62%2.19%3.13%2.95%3.29%3.08%2.96%2.67%
IQQ7.DE
iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF
2.98%3.36%2.99%3.21%3.87%2.04%3.54%3.11%4.53%3.38%3.34%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IQQ7.DE and H4ZL.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, H4ZL.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZL.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IQQ7.DE.

IQQ7.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT United States Dividend+, while H4ZL.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IQQ7.DE and 0.24% for H4ZL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQ7.DE and H4ZL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer