IQQ4.DE vs. R8T.DE
IQQ4.DE (iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF) and R8T.DE (abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds. IQQ4.DE is passively managed, while R8T.DE is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IQQ4.DE returned 0.64%/yr vs 3.46%/yr for R8T.DE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQ4.DE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for R8T.DE.
Performance
IQQ4.DE vs. R8T.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQ4.DE achieves a -5.43% return, which is significantly lower than R8T.DE's 5.83% return.
IQQ4.DE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -7.32%
- YTD
- -5.43%
- 6M
- -4.59%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 0.64%
- 5Y*
- -1.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.47%
R8T.DE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 6.12%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQQ4.DE vs. R8T.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQ4.DE iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF | -5.43% | 15.95% | -4.23% | -4.78% |
R8T.DE abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF | 5.83% | -3.97% | 2.59% | 5.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQ4.DE and R8T.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023 | 0.56 |
The correlation between IQQ4.DE and R8T.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQ4.DE vs. R8T.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQ4.DE
R8T.DE
IQQ4.DE vs. R8T.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ4.DE) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (R8T.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQ4.DE | R8T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.11 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 0.32 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | 0.55 | +0.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQ4.DE | R8T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 0.24 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.16 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
IQQ4.DE vs. R8T.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQ4.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.50%, which is greater than R8T.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ4.DE and R8T.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQ4.DE | R8T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.50% | -21.76% | -44.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.27% | -18.35% | +6.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.74% | -21.76% | +9.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.46% | -11.79% | -4.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.21% | -7.54% | -12.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 10.72% | -6.66% |
Volatility
IQQ4.DE vs. R8T.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ4.DE) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (R8T.DE) have volatilities of 2.96% and 2.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQ4.DE | R8T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.96% | 2.99% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.48% | 9.05% | -0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.27% | 24.56% | -13.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.94% | 18.55% | -6.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 18.55% | -3.82% |
IQQ4.DE vs. R8T.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQ4.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than R8T.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQ4.DE vs. R8T.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQ4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, while R8T.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQ4.DE iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF | 3.74% | 3.52% | 4.07% | 3.83% | 3.77% | 2.92% | 3.50% | 2.93% | 3.32% | 3.19% | 2.92% | 3.48% |
R8T.DE abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQ4.DE and R8T.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, R8T.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
R8T.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IQQ4.DE.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IQQ4.DE and 0.40% for R8T.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQ4.DE and R8T.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer