PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQ4.DE vs. EEPG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQ4.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ4.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Green UCITS ETF (EEPG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQ4.DE achieves a -5.43% return, which is significantly lower than EEPG.DE's -3.00% return.


IQQ4.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
-7.32%
YTD
-5.43%
6M
-4.59%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
0.64%
5Y*
-1.23%
10Y*
1.47%

EEPG.DE

1D
0.60%
1M
-3.25%
YTD
-3.00%
6M
-1.75%
1Y
-6.12%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
-9.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQ4.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IQQ4.DE
iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF
-5.43%15.95%-4.23%-5.70%-6.92%13.08%-16.71%2.22%
EEPG.DE
BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Green UCITS ETF
-3.00%3.23%-11.24%14.85%-39.69%10.89%-9.26%4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQ4.DE and EEPG.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQ4.DE vs. EEPG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQ4.DE
IQQ4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IQQ4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQ4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQ4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQ4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQ4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

EEPG.DE
EEPG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EEPG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEPG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEPG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
EEPG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEPG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQ4.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ4.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Green UCITS ETF (EEPG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQ4.DEEEPG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.95

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

-0.40

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.10

-0.93

+2.03

IQQ4.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQ4.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the EEPG.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQ4.DE and EEPG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQ4.DEEEPG.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

-0.39

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

-0.38

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

-0.27

+0.33

Drawdowns

IQQ4.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQ4.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.50%, which is greater than EEPG.DE's maximum drawdown of -52.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ4.DE and EEPG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQ4.DEEEPG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.50%

-52.41%

-14.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.27%

-16.02%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.74%

-23.61%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.58%

-52.41%

+29.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.46%

-42.84%

+26.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.21%

-31.56%

+11.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

6.85%

-2.79%

Volatility

IQQ4.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ4.DE) is 2.96%, while BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Green UCITS ETF (EEPG.DE) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that IQQ4.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEPG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQ4.DEEEPG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

4.98%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.48%

13.43%

-4.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.27%

16.33%

-5.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.94%

23.47%

-11.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.73%

24.01%

-9.28%

IQQ4.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQ4.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EEPG.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQ4.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQ4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, while EEPG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEPG.DE
BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Green UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQQ4.DE
iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF
3.74%3.52%4.07%3.83%3.77%2.92%3.50%2.93%3.32%3.19%2.92%3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQ4.DE and EEPG.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EEPG.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EEPG.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IQQ4.DE.

IQQ4.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Asia Dividend+, while EEPG.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Green. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IQQ4.DE and 0.40% for EEPG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQ4.DE and EEPG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer