IQQ4.DE vs. ASRM.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ4.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE).

IQQ4.DE and ASRM.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IQQ4.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Asia Dividend+. It was launched on Oct 20, 2006. ASRM.DE is a passively managed fund by BNP Paribas that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. It was launched on Dec 9, 2021. Both IQQ4.DE and ASRM.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IQQ4.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ4.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IQQ4.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IQQ4.DE iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF	-1.73%	15.95%	-4.23%	-5.70%	-6.92%	13.08%	-16.71%	18.57%	3.15%	3.88%
ASRM.DE BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-78.40%	-3.99%	-3.83%	0.89%	-16.42%	-14.47%	3.07%	-15.24%

Returns By Period

IQQ4.DE

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -5.62%
• YTD: -1.73%
• 6M: -0.21%
• 1Y: 10.58%
• 3Y*: 1.48%
• 5Y*: -0.24%
• 10Y*: 2.27%

ASRM.DE

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQ4.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQ4.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ASRM.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.

IQQ4.DE

iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF

ASRM.DE

BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

IQQ4.DE vs. ASRM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQ4.DE

IQQ4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 40
IQQ4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
IQQ4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
IQQ4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 37
IQQ4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
IQQ4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQ4.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ4.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IQQ4.DE	ASRM.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.01	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQQ4.DE	ASRM.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between IQQ4.DE and ASRM.DE is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IQQ4.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQ4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, while ASRM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IQQ4.DE iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF	3.51%	3.52%	4.07%	3.83%	3.77%	2.92%	3.50%	2.93%	3.32%	3.19%	2.92%	3.48%
ASRM.DE BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IQQ4.DE	ASRM.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.19%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.28%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IQQ4.DE	ASRM.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.15%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.98%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.84%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.77%	—	—