IQQ0.DE vs. F50A.DE
IQQ0.DE (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and F50A.DE (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Global Equities funds - IQQ0.DE tracks the MSCI World Minimum Volatility while F50A.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQQ0.DE returned 6.14%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for F50A.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQ0.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for F50A.DE.
Performance
IQQ0.DE vs. F50A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQ0.DE achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than F50A.DE's 10.81% return.
IQQ0.DE
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.63%
- 1Y
- 0.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.35%
- 5Y*
- 6.14%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
F50A.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 23.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- —
IQQ0.DE vs. F50A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQ0.DE iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.59% | -1.26% | 17.64% | 3.73% | -4.34% | 24.26% | -13.46% |
F50A.DE Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating | 10.81% | 8.58% | 25.85% | 19.91% | -13.61% | 32.73% | -0.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQ0.DE and F50A.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2020 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IQQ0.DE and F50A.DE has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQ0.DE vs. F50A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQ0.DE
F50A.DE
IQQ0.DE vs. F50A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IQQ0.DE) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQ0.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.40 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 3.66 | -3.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 14.61 | -14.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQ0.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | 2.17 | -2.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.88 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.71 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
IQQ0.DE vs. F50A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQ0.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.65%, smaller than the maximum F50A.DE drawdown of -32.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ0.DE and F50A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQ0.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.65% | -32.88% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.22% | -6.62% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.82% | -21.49% | +8.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.82% | -21.49% | +8.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.65% | -0.39% | -6.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -4.72% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 1.66% | +0.78% |
Volatility
IQQ0.DE vs. F50A.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IQQ0.DE) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE) have volatilities of 2.53% and 2.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQ0.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.53% | 2.63% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.36% | 7.95% | -2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.78% | 11.18% | -3.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.08% | 14.60% | -4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.62% | 17.70% | -6.08% |
IQQ0.DE vs. F50A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQ0.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than F50A.DE's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQ0.DE vs. F50A.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IQQ0.DE nor F50A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQ0.DE and F50A.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, F50A.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
F50A.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQQ0.DE.
IQQ0.DE tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility, while F50A.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IQQ0.DE and 0.05% for F50A.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQ0.DE and F50A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer