PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPRP.L vs. IWDP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPRP.L vs. IWDP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) and iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPRP.L achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than IWDP.L's 6.61% return. Over the past 10 years, IPRP.L has underperformed IWDP.L with an annualized return of 2.01%, while IWDP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 4.00% annualized return.


IPRP.L

1D
-1.58%
1M
-3.53%
YTD
-1.05%
6M
-0.53%
1Y
0.82%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
-3.66%
10Y*
2.01%

IWDP.L

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
6.61%
6M
6.76%
1Y
11.18%
3Y*
5.75%
5Y*
1.71%
10Y*
4.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPRP.L vs. IWDP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPRP.L
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF
-1.05%14.18%-4.49%16.04%-33.34%2.23%-3.56%18.93%-4.97%19.62%
IWDP.L
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP
6.61%1.71%1.22%4.00%-14.93%26.93%-12.50%17.31%-0.09%1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between IPRP.L and IWDP.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2006

0.63

The correlation between IPRP.L and IWDP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

IPRP.L vs. IWDP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPRP.L
IWDP.L

Real Estate

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

IPRP.L
100.0%
IWDP.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

IPRP.L

-

IWDP.L

-

Communication Services

IPRP.L

-

IWDP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IPRP.L

-

IWDP.L
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

IPRP.L

-

IWDP.L

-

Energy

IPRP.L

-

IWDP.L

-

Financial Services

IPRP.L

-

IWDP.L
0.1%

Healthcare

IPRP.L

-

IWDP.L

-

Industrials

IPRP.L

-

IWDP.L

-

Technology

IPRP.L

-

IWDP.L

-

Utilities

IPRP.L

-

IWDP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPRP.L vs. IWDP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPRP.L
IPRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
IPRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

IWDP.L
IWDP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IWDP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPRP.L vs. IWDP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) and iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPRP.LIWDP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.18

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

1.29

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.14

4.03

-3.89

IPRP.L vs. IWDP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPRP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the IWDP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPRP.L and IWDP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPRP.LIWDP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

1.02

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.12

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.26

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.26

-0.04

Drawdowns

IPRP.L vs. IWDP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPRP.L drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, roughly equal to the maximum IWDP.L drawdown of -58.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPRP.L and IWDP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPRP.LIWDP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.70%

-58.29%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.11%

-8.61%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.11%

-16.50%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.44%

-26.31%

-22.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.44%

-35.66%

-12.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.32%

-3.63%

-19.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.68%

-11.23%

-3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.87%

2.77%

+3.10%

Volatility

IPRP.L vs. IWDP.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L) at 3.01%. This indicates that IPRP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPRP.LIWDP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

3.01%

+1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

8.47%

+4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

10.89%

+4.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.51%

13.76%

+7.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.33%

15.55%

+3.78%

IPRP.L vs. IWDP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPRP.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IWDP.L's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPRP.L vs. IWDP.L - Dividend Comparison

IPRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than IWDP.L's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPRP.L
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF
3.36%3.32%3.30%3.05%4.90%2.47%2.96%3.46%3.70%3.20%3.07%3.60%
IWDP.L
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP
3.04%3.13%3.17%3.14%3.56%2.17%3.11%3.03%3.82%3.05%2.96%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPRP.L and IWDP.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IPRP.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IPRP.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IWDP.L.

IPRP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR, while IWDP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IPRP.L and 0.59% for IWDP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPRP.L and IWDP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer