PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IPRP.L vs. GLBL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IPRP.L vs. GLBL.L

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

IPRP.L (iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF) and GLBL.L (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged) are both exchange-traded funds - IPRP.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR, while GLBL.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IPRP.L returned -4.25%/yr vs -0.73%/yr for GLBL.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IPRP.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLBL.L.

Performance

IPRP.L vs. GLBL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IPRP.L is traded in GBp, while GLBL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GLBL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPRP.L achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than GLBL.L's -0.02% return.

IPRP.L

1D
-1.16%
1M
-2.58%
YTD
-1.60%
6M
-0.50%
1Y
-0.13%
3Y*
10.37%
5Y*
-4.25%
10Y*
1.38%

GLBL.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.63%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
-0.27%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
0.69%
5Y*
-0.73%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPRP.L vs. GLBL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IPRP.L
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF		-1.60%13.63%-4.96%15.42%-33.74%1.88%-3.84%18.45%-3.85%
GLBL.L
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged		-0.02%0.65%0.03%-0.43%-5.99%-3.96%5.31%3.31%-23.54%

Correlation

The correlation between IPRP.L and GLBL.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2018

0.17

The correlation between IPRP.L and GLBL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (5 years) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IPRP.L vs. GLBL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IPRP.L
GLBL.L

Real Estate

100.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.2%

Communication Services

-

3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.3%

Energy

-

1.4%

Financial Services

-

12.8%

Healthcare

-

0.8%

Industrials

-

1.2%

Technology

-

0.8%

Utilities

-

1.3%

Real Estate

IPRP.L
100.0%
GLBL.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

IPRP.L

-

GLBL.L
0.2%

Communication Services

IPRP.L

-

GLBL.L
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IPRP.L

-

GLBL.L
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

IPRP.L

-

GLBL.L
0.3%

Energy

IPRP.L

-

GLBL.L
1.4%

Financial Services

IPRP.L

-

GLBL.L
12.8%

Healthcare

IPRP.L

-

GLBL.L
0.8%

Industrials

IPRP.L

-

GLBL.L
1.2%

Technology

IPRP.L

-

GLBL.L
0.8%

Utilities

IPRP.L

-

GLBL.L
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged

Often compared with IPRP.L:
IPRP.L vs. IUSP.LIPRP.L vs. IEUSIPRP.L vs. VNQIPRP.L vs. IDWP.LIPRP.L vs. AYEP.DEIPRP.L vs. XDER.LIPRP.L vs. IJS
Often compared with GLBL.L:
GLBL.L vs. SHLDGLBL.L vs. GAGG.LGLBL.L vs. GLAD.LGLBL.L vs. GLAU.LGLBL.L vs. PRIG.LGLBL.L vs. GLAB.LGLBL.L vs. AGHG.L

Return for Risk

IPRP.L vs. GLBL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IPRP.L
IPRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
IPRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
GLBL.L
GLBL.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GLBL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPRP.L vs. GLBL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IPRP.LGLBL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.00
0.73

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.10
1.15

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.13

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.00

0.88

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.01

1.84

-1.85

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IPRP.L vs. GLBL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPRP.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the GLBL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPRP.L and GLBL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IPRP.LGLBL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

0.73

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

-0.11

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

-0.27

+0.37

Drawdowns

IPRP.L vs. GLBL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPRP.L drawdown since its inception was -64.48%, which is greater than GLBL.L's maximum drawdown of -30.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPRP.L and GLBL.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IPRP.LGLBL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.48%

-30.13%

-34.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.12%

-3.76%

-12.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.12%

-4.91%

-11.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.77%

-14.10%

-34.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.77%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.40%

-24.72%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.65%

-23.09%

+6.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.00%

1.80%

+4.20%

Volatility

IPRP.L vs. GLBL.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L) at 1.34%. This indicates that IPRP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLBL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IPRP.LGLBL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

1.34%

+2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.07%

3.31%

+9.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.20%

4.52%

+10.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.54%

6.63%

+14.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.35%

12.34%

+7.01%

IPRP.L vs. GLBL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPRP.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GLBL.L's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPRP.L vs. GLBL.L - Dividend Comparison

IPRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than GLBL.L's 3.15% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLBL.L
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged		3.15%3.14%2.76%2.05%1.39%1.22%1.54%1.67%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IPRP.L
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF		2.89%2.83%2.79%2.62%4.20%2.11%2.68%3.07%3.24%2.81%2.49%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

IPRP.L and GLBL.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLBL.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLBL.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IPRP.L.

IPRP.L is categorized as REIT, while GLBL.L is Global Bonds. IPRP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR, while GLBL.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IPRP.L and 0.10% for GLBL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPRP.L and GLBL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer