PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IPRP.L vs. FLRK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IPRP.L vs. FLRK.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IPRP.L (iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF) and FLRK.L (Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPRP.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR, while FLRK.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IPRP.L returned -3.55%/yr vs 20.63%/yr for FLRK.L. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IPRP.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLRK.L.

Performance

IPRP.L vs. FLRK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IPRP.L is traded in GBp, while FLRK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLRK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPRP.L achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than FLRK.L's 111.17% return.

IPRP.L

1D
0.61%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
0.27%
1Y
1.71%
3Y*
11.51%
5Y*
-3.55%
10Y*
1.98%

FLRK.L

1D
-5.06%
1M
19.12%
YTD
111.17%
6M
129.46%
1Y
234.17%
3Y*
46.37%
5Y*
20.63%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPRP.L vs. FLRK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IPRP.L
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF		-0.45%14.18%-4.49%16.04%-33.34%2.23%-3.56%6.17%
FLRK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF		111.17%82.09%-20.56%14.16%-19.37%-5.90%42.60%-14.15%

Correlation

The correlation between IPRP.L and FLRK.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2019

0.31

The correlation between IPRP.L and FLRK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IPRP.L vs. FLRK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IPRP.L
FLRK.L

Real Estate

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

2.4%

Communication Services

-

2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.7%

Energy

-

0.9%

Financial Services

-

8.7%

Healthcare

-

3.0%

Industrials

-

17.7%

Technology

-

57.4%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Real Estate

IPRP.L
100.0%
FLRK.L

-

Basic Materials

IPRP.L

-

FLRK.L
2.4%

Communication Services

IPRP.L

-

FLRK.L
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IPRP.L

-

FLRK.L
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

IPRP.L

-

FLRK.L
1.7%

Energy

IPRP.L

-

FLRK.L
0.9%

Financial Services

IPRP.L

-

FLRK.L
8.7%

Healthcare

IPRP.L

-

FLRK.L
3.0%

Industrials

IPRP.L

-

FLRK.L
17.7%

Technology

IPRP.L

-

FLRK.L
57.4%

Utilities

IPRP.L

-

FLRK.L
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF

Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF

Often compared with IPRP.L:
IPRP.L vs. IUSP.LIPRP.L vs. IEUSIPRP.L vs. VNQIPRP.L vs. IDWP.LIPRP.L vs. AYEP.DEIPRP.L vs. XDER.LIPRP.L vs. IJS
Often compared with FLRK.L:
FLRK.L vs. EWYFLRK.L vs. DIAFLRK.L vs. FRIN.LFLRK.L vs. IKOR.LFLRK.L vs. FRXT.LFLRK.L vs. CP9U.LFLRK.L vs. SSUN.F

Return for Risk

IPRP.L vs. FLRK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IPRP.L
IPRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
IPRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
FLRK.L
FLRK.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FLRK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPRP.L vs. FLRK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IPRP.LFLRK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.11
6.24

-6.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.27
5.75

-5.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.85

-0.81

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

10.98

-10.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.29

39.30

-39.01

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IPRP.L vs. FLRK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPRP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the FLRK.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPRP.L and FLRK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IPRP.LFLRK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

6.24

-6.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.81

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.67

-0.44

Drawdowns

IPRP.L vs. FLRK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPRP.L drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than FLRK.L's maximum drawdown of -41.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPRP.L and FLRK.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IPRP.LFLRK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.70%

-41.57%

-18.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.11%

-21.18%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.11%

-27.82%

+11.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.44%

-38.68%

-9.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.44%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.85%

-5.62%

-17.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.69%

-19.95%

+5.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.93%

5.93%

0.00%

Volatility

IPRP.L vs. FLRK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) is 4.48%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that IPRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLRK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IPRP.LFLRK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

18.09%

-13.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

32.92%

-19.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

37.31%

-22.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.51%

25.31%

-3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

27.31%

-7.99%

IPRP.L vs. FLRK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPRP.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRK.L's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPRP.L vs. FLRK.L - Dividend Comparison

IPRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, while FLRK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IPRP.L
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF		3.34%3.32%3.30%3.05%4.90%2.47%2.96%3.46%3.70%3.20%3.07%3.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

IPRP.L and FLRK.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLRK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLRK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IPRP.L.

IPRP.L is categorized as REIT, while FLRK.L is Asia Pacific Equities. IPRP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR, while FLRK.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IPRP.L and 0.09% for FLRK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPRP.L and FLRK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer