IPRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE
IPRE.DE (iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and ESAD.DE (BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation) are both REIT funds - IPRE.DE tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Dividend+ Index while ESAD.DE tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IPRE.DE returned 2.94% vs 17.44% for ESAD.DE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IPRE.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for ESAD.DE.
Performance
IPRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPRE.DE achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly lower than ESAD.DE's 15.93% return.
IPRE.DE
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- 2.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.39%
- 5Y*
- -4.50%
- 10Y*
- —
ESAD.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- YTD
- 15.93%
- 1Y
- 17.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IPRE.DE iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 2.94% | 8.66% | -4.36% |
ESAD.DE BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation | 15.93% | -3.81% | -4.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPRE.DE and ESAD.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2024 | 0.57 |
The correlation between IPRE.DE and ESAD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IPRE.DE
ESAD.DE
IPRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IPRE.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPRE.DE | ESAD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.26 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 2.10 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.45 | 6.95 | -6.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPRE.DE drawdown since its inception was -50.15%, which is greater than ESAD.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPRE.DE and ESAD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPRE.DE | ESAD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.15% | -16.71% | -33.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.03% | -8.26% | -6.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.92% | 0.00% | -24.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.69% | -5.65% | -18.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.51% | 2.50% | +4.01% |
Volatility
IPRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IPRE.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE) at 3.64%. This indicates that IPRE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESAD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPRE.DE | ESAD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 3.64% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.26% | 9.07% | +4.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.53% | 11.92% | +3.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 13.62% | +7.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 13.62% | +7.57% |
IPRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPRE.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ESAD.DE's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IPRE.DE nor ESAD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IPRE.DE and ESAD.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IPRE.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IPRE.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for ESAD.DE.
IPRE.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Dividend+ Index, while ESAD.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IPRE.DE and 0.41% for ESAD.DE.
Find the right allocation for IPRE.DE and ESAD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer