PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPOAX vs. GMAQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPOAX vs. GMAQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Ivy Systematic Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IPOAX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPOAX achieves a 18.05% return, which is significantly lower than GMAQX's 37.39% return.


IPOAX

1D
4.34%
1M
-1.19%
6M
7.44%
YTD
18.05%
1Y
34.17%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
8.80%
ALL TIME*
5.33%

GMAQX

1D
3.87%
1M
-3.47%
6M
24.02%
YTD
37.39%
1Y
60.19%
3Y*
25.92%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

IPOAX vs. GMAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IPOAX
Delaware Ivy Systematic Emerging Markets Equity Fund
18.05%26.53%7.71%10.86%-27.56%-6.01%
GMAQX
GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
37.39%32.09%0.62%27.41%-32.38%0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between IPOAX and GMAQX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2021

0.80

The correlation between IPOAX and GMAQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPOAX vs. GMAQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IPOAX
IPOAX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IPOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IPOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

GMAQX
GMAQX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GMAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GMAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IPOAX vs. GMAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Systematic Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IPOAX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IPOAXGMAQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.45

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

3.49

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.92

11.14

-4.22

IPOAX vs. GMAQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPOAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the GMAQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPOAX and GMAQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IPOAX vs. GMAQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPOAX drawdown since its inception was -67.11%, which is greater than GMAQX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPOAX and GMAQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPOAXGMAQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.11%

-41.97%

-25.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.39%

-16.27%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.86%

-19.64%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.70%

-13.02%

+4.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.58%

-16.45%

-7.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

5.09%

-0.63%

Volatility

IPOAX vs. GMAQX - Volatility Comparison

Delaware Ivy Systematic Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IPOAX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) have volatilities of 9.36% and 9.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPOAXGMAQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.36%

9.63%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.68%

23.87%

-3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.72%

25.42%

-2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.78%

18.28%

+2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.60%

18.28%

+2.32%

IPOAX vs. GMAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPOAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GMAQX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPOAX vs. GMAQX - Dividend Comparison

IPOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.48%, less than GMAQX's 12.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMAQX
GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
12.03%9.43%32.28%6.76%4.94%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IPOAX
Delaware Ivy Systematic Emerging Markets Equity Fund
8.48%10.01%3.35%3.23%14.83%0.55%0.75%0.74%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPOAX and GMAQX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMAQX has higher volatility (9.63%) compared to IPOAX (9.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPOAX dropped -67.11% vs GMAQX's -41.97%.

GMAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPOAX and GMAQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer