IPOAX vs. EAEMX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

IPOAX (Delaware Ivy Systematic Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and EAEMX (Parametric Emerging Markets Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, IPOAX returned 10.67%/yr vs 7.19%/yr for EAEMX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IPOAX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for EAEMX.

Performance

IPOAX vs. EAEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Ivy Systematic Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IPOAX) and Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPOAX achieves a 29.30% return, which is significantly higher than EAEMX's 12.25% return. Over the past 10 years, IPOAX has outperformed EAEMX with an annualized return of 10.67%, while EAEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.19% annualized return.

IPOAX

• 1D: 2.66%
• 1M: 7.04%
• YTD: 29.30%
• 6M: 32.17%
• 1Y: 48.61%
• 3Y*: 21.10%
• 5Y*: 5.05%
• 10Y*: 10.67%

EAEMX

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 2.48%
• YTD: 12.25%
• 6M: 12.83%
• 1Y: 30.95%
• 3Y*: 15.31%
• 5Y*: 7.13%
• 10Y*: 7.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPOAX vs. EAEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IPOAX Delaware Ivy Systematic Emerging Markets Equity Fund	29.30%	26.53%	7.71%	10.86%	-27.56%	-4.67%	35.01%	23.23%	-19.83%	42.47%
EAEMX Parametric Emerging Markets Fund	12.25%	27.16%	5.39%	9.46%	-11.27%	4.19%	2.65%	12.32%	-14.02%	27.03%

Correlation

The correlation between IPOAX and EAEMX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2006	0.82

The correlation between IPOAX and EAEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IPOAX vs. EAEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPOAX

IPOAX Risk / Return Rank: 74
IPOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
IPOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
IPOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
IPOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
IPOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

EAEMX

EAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 73
EAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
EAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
EAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
EAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPOAX vs. EAEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Systematic Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IPOAX) and Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IPOAX	EAEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	2.45	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	3.31	-0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.49	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	3.05	+0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.83	11.00	+1.83

IPOAX vs. EAEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPOAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the EAEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPOAX and EAEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IPOAX vs. EAEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPOAX drawdown since its inception was -67.11%, which is greater than EAEMX's maximum drawdown of -62.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPOAX and EAEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPOAX	EAEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.11%	-62.70%	-4.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.39%	-9.90%	-3.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.86%	-11.74%	-5.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.52%	-24.73%	-17.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.79%	-44.16%	-1.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.87%	+0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.64%	-13.45%	-10.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.75%	2.74%	+1.01%

Volatility

IPOAX vs. EAEMX - Volatility Comparison

Delaware Ivy Systematic Emerging Markets Equity Fund (IPOAX) has a higher volatility of 10.25% compared to Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX) at 5.07%. This indicates that IPOAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPOAX	EAEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.25%	5.07%	+5.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.97%	10.83%	+7.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.32%	12.33%	+7.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.39%	11.75%	+8.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.45%	13.46%	+6.99%

IPOAX vs. EAEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPOAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EAEMX's 1.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPOAX vs. EAEMX - Dividend Comparison

IPOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, more than EAEMX's 2.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAEMX Parametric Emerging Markets Fund	2.52%	2.83%	3.00%	2.71%	4.40%	1.64%	1.08%	2.48%	2.14%	2.31%	1.52%	1.68%
IPOAX Delaware Ivy Systematic Emerging Markets Equity Fund	7.74%	10.01%	3.35%	3.23%	14.83%	0.55%	0.75%	0.74%	0.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPOAX and EAEMX in my portfolio?

IPOAX and EAEMX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IPOAX or EAEMX?

IPOAX has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to EAEMX (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPOAX dropped -67.11% vs EAEMX's -62.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.