PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPKW vs. SMIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPKW vs. SMIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) and iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPKW achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly higher than SMIN's -4.03% return. Over the past 10 years, IPKW has outperformed SMIN with an annualized return of 11.93%, while SMIN has yielded a comparatively lower 9.73% annualized return.


IPKW

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
5.48%
6M
7.67%
1Y
23.37%
3Y*
22.77%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*
11.93%

SMIN

1D
1.44%
1M
0.72%
YTD
-4.03%
6M
-1.54%
1Y
-8.33%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPKW vs. SMIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
5.48%45.50%10.56%15.12%-12.81%11.41%16.18%20.26%-21.59%34.21%
SMIN
iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF
-4.03%-6.68%16.78%35.41%-14.23%44.43%19.59%-5.21%-25.55%62.36%

Correlation

The correlation between IPKW and SMIN is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2014

0.45

The correlation between IPKW and SMIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IPKW vs. SMIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPKW
SMIN

Financial Services

35.1%
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

17.7%
14.0%

Energy

17.4%
1.2%

Industrials

11.8%
21.2%

Communication Services

5.4%
1.4%

Technology

3.8%
8.0%

Utilities

3.3%
2.4%

Basic Materials

3.0%
10.9%

Healthcare

1.0%
15.1%

Real Estate

1.0%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
3.9%

Financial Services

IPKW
35.1%
SMIN
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IPKW
17.7%
SMIN
14.0%

Energy

IPKW
17.4%
SMIN
1.2%

Industrials

IPKW
11.8%
SMIN
21.2%

Communication Services

IPKW
5.4%
SMIN
1.4%

Technology

IPKW
3.8%
SMIN
8.0%

Utilities

IPKW
3.3%
SMIN
2.4%

Basic Materials

IPKW
3.0%
SMIN
10.9%

Healthcare

IPKW
1.0%
SMIN
15.1%

Real Estate

IPKW
1.0%
SMIN
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

IPKW
0.4%
SMIN
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPKW vs. SMIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPKW
IPKW Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IPKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPKW Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IPKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPKW Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SMIN
SMIN Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
SMIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMIN Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
SMIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMIN Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPKW vs. SMIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) and iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IPKWSMINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.93

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

-0.39

+2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.37

-0.87

+9.23

IPKW vs. SMIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPKW Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the SMIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPKW and SMIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IPKW vs. SMIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPKW drawdown since its inception was -47.24%, smaller than the maximum SMIN drawdown of -60.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPKW and SMIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPKWSMINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.24%

-60.50%

+13.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.14%

-24.54%

+15.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.77%

-27.58%

+9.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

-27.58%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.24%

-60.50%

+13.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-16.07%

+13.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-14.62%

+5.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

11.01%

-8.29%

Volatility

IPKW vs. SMIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) is 4.33%, while iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that IPKW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPKWSMINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

4.86%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.27%

15.58%

-3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.68%

18.67%

-3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

18.88%

-1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.90%

22.83%

-4.93%

IPKW vs. SMIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPKW has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than SMIN's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPKW vs. SMIN - Dividend Comparison

IPKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than SMIN's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
3.54%3.55%4.12%2.66%3.77%7.37%1.45%2.41%2.61%0.93%2.82%1.31%
SMIN
iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF
2.10%2.01%6.84%0.41%0.01%1.27%1.06%1.75%1.68%0.89%2.30%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPKW and SMIN have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMIN has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to IPKW (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPKW dropped -47.24% vs SMIN's -60.50%.

On 10-year performance, IPKW leads with 11.93% vs 9.73% for SMIN. On fees, IPKW is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, IPKW has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IPKW has performed better with a 11.93% return vs 9.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IPKW is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for SMIN.

IPKW has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 2.10% for SMIN.

IPKW is categorized as Global Equities, while SMIN is Asia Pacific Equities. IPKW tracks NASDAQ International BuyBack Achievers Index, while SMIN tracks MSCI India Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IPKW and 0.76% for SMIN.

IPKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPKW and SMIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer