PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPKW vs. AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPKW vs. AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) and Amer Sports, Inc (AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPKW achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly higher than AS's -5.06% return.


IPKW

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
5.48%
6M
7.67%
1Y
23.37%
3Y*
22.77%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*
11.93%

AS

1D
-0.39%
1M
6.39%
YTD
-5.06%
6M
-7.56%
1Y
-2.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPKW vs. AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
5.48%45.50%13.47%
AS
Amer Sports, Inc
-5.06%33.58%108.66%

Correlation

The correlation between IPKW and AS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPKW vs. AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPKW
IPKW Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IPKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPKW Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IPKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPKW Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

AS
AS Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPKW vs. AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) and Amer Sports, Inc (AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IPKWASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.01

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

-0.18

+2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.37

-0.36

+8.73

IPKW vs. AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPKW Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the AS Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPKW and AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IPKW vs. AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPKW drawdown since its inception was -47.24%, which is greater than AS's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPKW and AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPKWASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.24%

-40.71%

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.14%

-28.78%

+19.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-15.49%

+12.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-13.29%

+4.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

14.56%

-11.84%

Volatility

IPKW vs. AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) is 4.33%, while Amer Sports, Inc (AS) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that IPKW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPKWASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

10.17%

-5.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.27%

29.10%

-16.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.68%

41.31%

-26.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

49.55%

-32.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.90%

49.55%

-31.65%

Dividends

IPKW vs. AS - Dividend Comparison

IPKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, while AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AS
Amer Sports, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
3.54%3.55%4.12%2.66%3.77%7.37%1.45%2.41%2.61%0.93%2.82%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPKW and AS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AS has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to IPKW (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPKW dropped -47.24% vs AS's -40.71%.

IPKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPKW and AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer