PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPFPX vs. YAFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPFPX vs. YAFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Poplar Forest Partners Fund (IPFPX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPFPX achieves a 15.60% return, which is significantly lower than YAFFX's 31.39% return. Over the past 10 years, IPFPX has underperformed YAFFX with an annualized return of 10.53%, while YAFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.94% annualized return.


IPFPX

1D
0.16%
1M
6.36%
YTD
15.60%
6M
17.18%
1Y
36.04%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
10.39%
10Y*
10.53%

YAFFX

1D
3.61%
1M
10.56%
YTD
31.39%
6M
15.83%
1Y
29.44%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
12.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPFPX vs. YAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPFPX
Poplar Forest Partners Fund
15.60%22.94%6.24%5.02%0.81%39.49%-1.26%21.64%-18.64%6.84%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
31.39%3.89%9.30%16.53%-8.20%16.48%17.22%19.21%2.99%20.07%

Correlation

The correlation between IPFPX and YAFFX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between IPFPX and YAFFX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPFPX vs. YAFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPFPX
IPFPX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IPFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
IPFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

YAFFX
YAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
YAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
YAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPFPX vs. YAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Poplar Forest Partners Fund (IPFPX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPFPXYAFFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.00

1.38

+1.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.28

1.51

+2.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.37

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

1.76

+2.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.69

6.40

+10.29

IPFPX vs. YAFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPFPX Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the YAFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPFPX and YAFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPFPXYAFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

1.38

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.58

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.79

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.62

-0.04

Drawdowns

IPFPX vs. YAFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPFPX drawdown since its inception was -47.77%, which is greater than YAFFX's maximum drawdown of -43.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPFPX and YAFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPFPXYAFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.77%

-43.80%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-17.08%

+8.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.15%

-18.88%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.94%

-21.31%

+3.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.77%

-30.62%

-17.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

0.00%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-6.21%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

4.70%

-2.50%

Volatility

IPFPX vs. YAFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Poplar Forest Partners Fund (IPFPX) is 3.78%, while AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that IPFPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPFPXYAFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

6.09%

-2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

22.30%

-13.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.28%

22.23%

-9.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.00%

18.09%

-2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.85%

16.53%

+3.32%

IPFPX vs. YAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPFPX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than YAFFX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPFPX vs. YAFFX - Dividend Comparison

IPFPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.20%, while YAFFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPFPX
Poplar Forest Partners Fund
8.20%9.47%10.86%3.89%6.17%14.47%2.41%1.64%12.47%5.01%2.19%0.94%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
0.00%0.00%18.44%4.42%7.60%4.70%11.87%15.84%22.15%11.82%11.81%24.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPFPX and YAFFX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YAFFX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to IPFPX (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPFPX dropped -47.77% vs YAFFX's -43.80%.

IPFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPFPX and YAFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer