IPFPX vs. NEIMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IPFPX (Poplar Forest Partners Fund) and NEIMX (Neiman Large Cap Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, IPFPX returned 10.64%/yr vs 10.34%/yr for NEIMX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IPFPX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for NEIMX.

Performance

IPFPX vs. NEIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Poplar Forest Partners Fund (IPFPX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IPFPX having a 16.81% return and NEIMX slightly higher at 17.29%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IPFPX having a 10.64% annualized return and NEIMX not far behind at 10.34%.

IPFPX

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: 8.02%
• YTD: 16.81%
• 6M: 17.73%
• 1Y: 36.21%
• 3Y*: 19.36%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: 10.64%

NEIMX

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 4.85%
• YTD: 17.29%
• 6M: 17.10%
• 1Y: 34.32%
• 3Y*: 19.56%
• 5Y*: 12.08%
• 10Y*: 10.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPFPX vs. NEIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IPFPX Poplar Forest Partners Fund	16.81%	22.94%	6.24%	5.02%	0.81%	39.49%	-1.26%	21.64%	-18.64%	6.84%
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund	17.29%	18.68%	13.50%	6.15%	-5.16%	23.85%	-5.97%	23.49%	-9.76%	19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IPFPX and NEIMX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010	0.83

The correlation between IPFPX and NEIMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IPFPX vs. NEIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPFPX

IPFPX Risk / Return Rank: 87
IPFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
IPFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
IPFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
IPFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IPFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

NEIMX

NEIMX Risk / Return Rank: 94
NEIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
NEIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
NEIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
NEIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
NEIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPFPX vs. NEIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Poplar Forest Partners Fund (IPFPX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IPFPX	NEIMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.06	3.45	-0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.36	4.78	-0.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.63	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.53	6.10	-1.57
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.06	25.48	-8.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IPFPX vs. NEIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPFPX Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is comparable to the NEIMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPFPX and NEIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IPFPX	NEIMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.06	3.45	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.02	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.03	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.03	+0.55

Drawdowns

IPFPX vs. NEIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPFPX drawdown since its inception was -47.77%, smaller than the maximum NEIMX drawdown of -92.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPFPX and NEIMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPFPX	NEIMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.77%	-92.94%	+45.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	-5.75%	-2.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.15%	-92.94%	+78.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.94%	-92.94%	+75.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.77%	-92.94%	+45.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-88.99%	+88.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.69%	-10.51%	+3.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	1.37%	+0.83%

Volatility

IPFPX vs. NEIMX - Volatility Comparison

Poplar Forest Partners Fund (IPFPX) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) at 2.72%. This indicates that IPFPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPFPX	NEIMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.82%	2.72%	+1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.12%	7.81%	+1.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.29%	10.18%	+2.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.00%	576.30%	-560.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.85%	407.70%	-387.85%

IPFPX vs. NEIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPFPX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than NEIMX's 1.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPFPX vs. NEIMX - Dividend Comparison

IPFPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.11%, more than NEIMX's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IPFPX Poplar Forest Partners Fund	8.11%	9.47%	10.86%	3.89%	6.17%	14.47%	2.41%	1.64%	12.47%	5.01%	2.19%	0.94%
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund	0.65%	0.76%	1.10%	1.36%	3.60%	17.65%	1.20%	2.26%	1.20%	6.64%	10.20%	4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPFPX and NEIMX in my portfolio?

IPFPX and NEIMX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IPFPX or NEIMX?

IPFPX has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to NEIMX (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPFPX dropped -47.77% vs NEIMX's -92.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NEIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 3.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.