PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IOZ.AX vs. ILC.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IOZ.AX vs. ILC.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

IOZ.AX (Ishares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF) and ILC.AX (iShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IOZ.AX is a Australia Equities fund tracking the S&P/ASX 200 Index, while ILC.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the iShares S&P/ASX 20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IOZ.AX returned 8.95%/yr vs 9.58%/yr for ILC.AX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure.

Performance

IOZ.AX vs. ILC.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Ishares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF (IOZ.AX) and iShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF (ILC.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOZ.AX achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly lower than ILC.AX's 9.65% return. Over the past 10 years, IOZ.AX has underperformed ILC.AX with an annualized return of 8.95%, while ILC.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.58% annualized return.

IOZ.AX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.68%
6M
1.81%
YTD
3.07%
1Y
5.71%
3Y*
10.31%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
8.95%

ILC.AX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.00%
6M
9.35%
YTD
9.65%
1Y
10.72%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOZ.AX vs. ILC.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IOZ.AX
Ishares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF		3.07%10.22%11.35%12.19%-0.91%16.90%1.35%23.29%-2.99%11.59%
ILC.AX
iShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF		9.65%7.10%11.42%12.56%3.62%15.87%0.87%20.21%-0.14%6.77%

Correlation

The correlation between IOZ.AX and ILC.AX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2010

0.89

The correlation between IOZ.AX and ILC.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Ishares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF

iShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF

Often compared with IOZ.AX:
IOZ.AX vs. NDQ.AXIOZ.AX vs. IOOIOZ.AX vs. IVVIOZ.AX vs. A200.AXIOZ.AX vs. GLDN.AXIOZ.AX vs. AUDUSD=XIOZ.AX vs. LYP6.DE

Return for Risk

IOZ.AX vs. ILC.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IOZ.AX
IOZ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOZ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOZ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IOZ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOZ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
ILC.AX
ILC.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ILC.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILC.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILC.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ILC.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILC.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOZ.AX vs. ILC.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF (IOZ.AX) and iShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF (ILC.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IOZ.AXILC.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.53
0.81

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.83
1.25

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.15

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

1.60

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.80

3.57

-1.76

IOZ.AX vs. ILC.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the ILC.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOZ.AX and ILC.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IOZ.AX vs. ILC.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOZ.AX drawdown since its inception was -35.75%, which is greater than ILC.AX's maximum drawdown of -31.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOZ.AX and ILC.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IOZ.AXILC.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.75%

-31.95%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-7.57%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.35%

-13.62%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.92%

-14.27%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.75%

-31.95%

-3.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-1.27%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-5.43%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

3.44%

+0.17%

Volatility

IOZ.AX vs. ILC.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF (IOZ.AX) is 2.34%, while iShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF (ILC.AX) has a volatility of 3.06%. This indicates that IOZ.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILC.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IOZ.AXILC.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.34%

3.06%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.91%

10.86%

-0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

15.06%

-2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.86%

13.78%

-0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.28%

15.10%

-0.82%

Dividends

IOZ.AX vs. ILC.AX - Dividend Comparison

IOZ.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than ILC.AX's 3.73% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILC.AX
iShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF		3.73%4.04%4.49%4.01%6.95%3.91%1.96%5.38%4.99%4.99%4.55%5.50%
IOZ.AX
Ishares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF		3.42%3.39%3.47%3.73%6.11%3.32%2.40%4.62%4.27%3.90%4.89%7.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

IOZ.AX and ILC.AX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IOZ.AX is categorized as Australia Equities, while ILC.AX is Global Equities. IOZ.AX tracks S&P/ASX 200 Index, while ILC.AX tracks iShares S&P/ASX 20 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IOZ.AX and ILC.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer