IOYY vs. DBO
IOYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - IOYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. IOYY is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. IOYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
IOYY vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IOYY achieves a -11.92% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return.
IOYY
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- -11.92%
- 6M
- -23.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- 79.84%
- 6M
- 74.51%
- 1Y
- 77.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
IOYY vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IOYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF | -11.92% | -11.64% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 79.84% | -3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between IOYY and DBO is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IOYY vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
IOYY
DBO
IOYY vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF (IOYY) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IOYY | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.03 | 0.02 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
IOYY vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IOYY drawdown since its inception was -38.47%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOYY and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IOYY | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.47% | -90.18% | +51.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.57% | -52.68% | +24.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.12% | -62.25% | +39.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.94% | — |
Volatility
IOYY vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IOYY | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.32% | 34.58% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.32% | 32.31% | +2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.32% | 31.79% | +2.53% |
IOYY vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IOYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
IOYY vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
IOYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 122.28%, more than DBO's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.95% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
IOYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF | 122.28% | 28.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IOYY and DBO have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for IOYY.
IOYY has the higher dividend yield at 122.28%, compared with 1.95% for DBO.
IOYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for IOYY and 0.78% for DBO.
Find the right allocation for IOYY and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer