IONZ vs. MSDD
IONZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF) and MSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IONZ returned -94.12% vs 179.44% for MSDD. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IONZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MSDD.
Performance
IONZ vs. MSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IONZ achieves a -76.00% return, which is significantly lower than MSDD's -48.72% return.
IONZ
- 1D
- 12.86%
- 1M
- 116.73%
- 6M
- -71.26%
- YTD
- -76.00%
- 1Y
- -94.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSDD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- -31.48%
- YTD
- -48.72%
- 1Y
- 179.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IONZ vs. MSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IONZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF | -76.00% | -80.36% |
MSDD GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF | -48.72% | 230.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between IONZ and MSDD is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IONZ vs. MSDD — Risk / Return Rank
IONZ
MSDD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IONZ vs. MSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF (IONZ) and GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IONZ | MSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.22 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 0.92 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 1.81 | -3.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IONZ vs. MSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IONZ drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, which is greater than MSDD's maximum drawdown of -84.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONZ and MSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IONZ | MSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.66% | -84.91% | -13.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.41% | -84.91% | -13.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.05% | -68.63% | -27.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.45% | -31.40% | -44.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 78.56% | 43.10% | +35.46% |
Volatility
IONZ vs. MSDD - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF (IONZ) has a higher volatility of 40.37% compared to GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) at 32.11%. This indicates that IONZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IONZ | MSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 40.37% | 32.11% | +8.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 155.08% | 124.37% | +30.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 186.72% | 140.94% | +45.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 185.79% | 138.59% | +47.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 185.79% | 138.59% | +47.20% |
IONZ vs. MSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IONZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MSDD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IONZ vs. MSDD - Dividend Comparison
Neither IONZ nor MSDD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IONZ and MSDD have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IONZ has higher volatility (40.37%) compared to MSDD (32.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IONZ dropped -98.66% vs MSDD's -84.91%.
On 1-year performance, MSDD leads with 179.44% vs -94.12% for IONZ. On fees, IONZ is cheaper at 1.29% per year. On volatility, MSDD has been the lower-risk option at 32.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSDD has performed better with a 179.44% return vs -94.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IONZ is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSDD.
IONZ and MSDD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for IONZ and 1.50% for MSDD.
MSDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IONZ and MSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer