IONX vs. XMAG
IONX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF) and XMAG (Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IONX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while XMAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index. IONX is actively managed, while XMAG is passively managed. Over the past year, IONX returned 0.44% vs 24.62% for XMAG. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IONX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMAG.
Performance
IONX vs. XMAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IONX achieves a 41.84% return, which is significantly higher than XMAG's 12.73% return.
IONX
- 1D
- -8.85%
- 1M
- 97.31%
- YTD
- 41.84%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 0.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMAG
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 13.28%
- 1Y
- 24.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IONX vs. XMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IONX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF | 41.84% | 67.09% |
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | 12.73% | 17.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between IONX and XMAG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2025 | 0.43 |
IONX vs. XMAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IONX
XMAG
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IONX
XMAG
Basic Materials
IONX
-
XMAG
Communication Services
IONX
-
XMAG
Consumer Cyclical
IONX
-
XMAG
Consumer Defensive
IONX
-
XMAG
Energy
IONX
-
XMAG
Financial Services
IONX
-
XMAG
Healthcare
IONX
-
XMAG
Industrials
IONX
-
XMAG
Real Estate
IONX
-
XMAG
Utilities
IONX
-
XMAG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IONX vs. XMAG — Risk / Return Rank
IONX
XMAG
IONX vs. XMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF (IONX) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IONX | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.39 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.00 | 3.39 | -3.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.01 | 15.15 | -15.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IONX | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 | 2.23 | -2.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 1.11 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
IONX vs. XMAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IONX drawdown since its inception was -93.75%, which is greater than XMAG's maximum drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONX and XMAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IONX | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.75% | -16.17% | -77.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.75% | -7.29% | -86.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.65% | 0.00% | -67.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.74% | -2.13% | -47.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.55% | 1.63% | +60.92% |
Volatility
IONX vs. XMAG - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF (IONX) has a higher volatility of 59.39% compared to Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) at 2.87%. This indicates that IONX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IONX | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 59.39% | 2.87% | +56.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 130.91% | 8.65% | +122.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 181.50% | 11.10% | +170.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 199.14% | 15.12% | +184.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 199.14% | 15.12% | +184.02% |
IONX vs. XMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IONX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than XMAG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IONX vs. XMAG - Dividend Comparison
IONX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than XMAG's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IONX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF | 1.80% | 2.55% | 0.00% |
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | 0.46% | 0.51% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IONX and XMAG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IONX has higher volatility (59.39%) compared to XMAG (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IONX dropped -93.75% vs XMAG's -16.17%.
On 1-year performance, XMAG leads with 24.62% vs 0.44% for IONX. On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMAG has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XMAG has performed better with a 24.62% return vs 0.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for IONX.
IONX has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.46% for XMAG.
IONX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for IONX and 0.35% for XMAG.
XMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IONX and XMAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer