ION vs. KF
ION (Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF) and KF (The Korea Fund Inc) are both funds - ION is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the S&P Global Core Battery Metals Index - Benchmark TR Net, while KF is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Allianz Global Investors. Over the past 3 years, ION returned 7.83%/yr vs 39.52%/yr for KF. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ION charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for KF.
Performance
ION vs. KF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ION achieves a -12.05% return, which is significantly lower than KF's 67.98% return.
ION
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -19.28%
- 6M
- -23.00%
- YTD
- -12.05%
- 1Y
- 45.93%
- 3Y*
- 7.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.98%
KF
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -23.79%
- 6M
- 46.80%
- YTD
- 67.98%
- 1Y
- 126.73%
- 3Y*
- 39.52%
- 5Y*
- 15.72%
- 10Y*
- 14.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.29%
ION vs. KF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | -12.05% | 108.37% | -20.02% | -14.10% | -8.45% |
KF The Korea Fund Inc | 67.98% | 99.36% | -19.29% | 12.34% | -3.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between ION and KF is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2022 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ION vs. KF — Risk / Return Rank
ION
KF
ION vs. KF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) and The Korea Fund Inc (KF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ION | KF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.42 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 5.01 | -3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.26 | 15.30 | -11.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ION vs. KF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ION drawdown since its inception was -52.08%, smaller than the maximum KF drawdown of -85.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ION and KF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ION | KF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.08% | -85.25% | +33.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.66% | -25.42% | -8.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.11% | -28.04% | -17.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.66% | -23.79% | -9.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.68% | -37.81% | +14.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.81% | 8.31% | +2.50% |
Volatility
ION vs. KF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) is 9.58%, while The Korea Fund Inc (KF) has a volatility of 20.94%. This indicates that ION experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ION | KF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.58% | 20.94% | -11.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.29% | 45.16% | -13.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.13% | 48.31% | -8.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.64% | 29.99% | +1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.64% | 27.21% | +4.43% |
ION vs. KF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ION has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than KF's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
ION vs. KF - Dividend Comparison
ION's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than KF's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | 1.69% | 1.63% | 1.74% | 2.23% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KF The Korea Fund Inc | 0.72% | 1.20% | 2.46% | 0.00% | 15.93% | 26.50% | 1.30% | 0.24% | 18.67% | 9.75% | 1.03% | 13.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ION and KF have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KF has higher volatility (20.94%) compared to ION (9.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ION dropped -52.08% vs KF's -85.25%.
KF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ION and KF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer