ION vs. IGE
ION (Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF) and IGE (iShares North American Natural Resources ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - ION tracks the S&P Global Core Battery Metals Index - Benchmark TR Net while IGE tracks the S&P North American Natural Resources Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ION returned 18.91%/yr vs 20.25%/yr for IGE. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ION charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGE.
Performance
ION vs. IGE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ION achieves a 14.02% return, which is significantly lower than IGE's 22.98% return.
ION
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- -9.27%
- YTD
- 14.02%
- 6M
- 27.44%
- 1Y
- 123.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGE
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 22.98%
- 6M
- 23.36%
- 1Y
- 43.74%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 17.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.79%
ION vs. IGE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | 14.02% | 108.37% | -20.02% | -14.10% | -8.86% |
IGE iShares North American Natural Resources ETF | 22.98% | 20.41% | 7.55% | 3.12% | -3.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between ION and IGE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2022 | 0.46 |
The correlation between ION and IGE shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ION vs. IGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ION
IGE
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Energy
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
ION
IGE
Financial Services
ION
IGE
-
Energy
ION
IGE
Real Estate
ION
IGE
-
Healthcare
ION
IGE
Industrials
ION
IGE
Communication Services
ION
-
IGE
-
Consumer Cyclical
ION
-
IGE
Consumer Defensive
ION
-
IGE
-
Technology
ION
-
IGE
-
Utilities
ION
-
IGE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ION vs. IGE — Risk / Return Rank
ION
IGE
ION vs. IGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) and iShares North American Natural Resources ETF (IGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ION | IGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.45 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.33 | 7.93 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.79 | 19.51 | -0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ION | IGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.27 | 2.75 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.30 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
ION vs. IGE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ION drawdown since its inception was -52.08%, smaller than the maximum IGE drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ION and IGE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ION | IGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.08% | -67.55% | +15.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.30% | -5.54% | -17.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.47% | -19.49% | -26.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.99% | -2.86% | -11.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.70% | -18.90% | -4.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.59% | 2.25% | +4.34% |
Volatility
ION vs. IGE - Volatility Comparison
Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) has a higher volatility of 12.06% compared to iShares North American Natural Resources ETF (IGE) at 4.40%. This indicates that ION's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ION | IGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.06% | 4.40% | +7.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.90% | 12.67% | +17.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.92% | 15.98% | +21.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.08% | 22.45% | +8.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.08% | 24.94% | +6.14% |
ION vs. IGE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ION has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IGE's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ION vs. IGE - Dividend Comparison
ION's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than IGE's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGE iShares North American Natural Resources ETF | 1.89% | 2.32% | 2.54% | 2.85% | 2.96% | 2.92% | 3.34% | 5.55% | 2.68% | 2.11% | 1.66% | 3.08% |
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | 1.40% | 1.63% | 1.74% | 2.23% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ION and IGE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ION has higher volatility (12.06%) compared to IGE (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ION dropped -52.08% vs IGE's -67.55%.
On 3-year performance, IGE leads with 20.25% vs 18.91% for ION. On fees, IGE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGE has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IGE has performed better with a 20.25% return vs 18.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for ION.
IGE has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 1.40% for ION.
ION tracks S&P Global Core Battery Metals Index - Benchmark TR Net, while IGE tracks S&P North American Natural Resources Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for ION and 0.39% for IGE.
ION currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ION and IGE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer