PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IOLZX vs. FTQGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IOLZX vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ICON Equity Fund (IOLZX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IOLZX having a 30.88% return and FTQGX slightly higher at 32.36%. Over the past 10 years, IOLZX has underperformed FTQGX with an annualized return of 15.49%, while FTQGX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.05% annualized return.


IOLZX

1D
0.36%
1M
7.28%
YTD
30.88%
6M
29.23%
1Y
53.97%
3Y*
25.06%
5Y*
11.89%
10Y*
15.49%

FTQGX

1D
0.22%
1M
9.32%
YTD
32.36%
6M
30.89%
1Y
55.95%
3Y*
31.26%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
20.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOLZX vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IOLZX
ICON Equity Fund
30.88%15.81%16.87%12.13%-17.78%26.72%16.00%38.22%-16.69%26.78%
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
32.36%13.65%36.95%28.94%-26.68%26.91%33.41%31.44%4.90%30.66%

Correlation

The correlation between IOLZX and FTQGX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2004

0.82

The correlation between IOLZX and FTQGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IOLZX vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOLZX
IOLZX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IOLZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOLZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOLZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IOLZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOLZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FTQGX
FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOLZX vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICON Equity Fund (IOLZX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IOLZXFTQGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.46

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

4.51

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.84

18.97

-5.13

IOLZX vs. FTQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOLZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the FTQGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOLZX and FTQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IOLZX vs. FTQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOLZX drawdown since its inception was -56.03%, smaller than the maximum FTQGX drawdown of -61.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOLZX and FTQGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IOLZXFTQGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.03%

-61.29%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.35%

-12.76%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.71%

-26.84%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.77%

-32.31%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.04%

-32.31%

-8.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.61%

-14.17%

+1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

3.03%

+1.02%

Volatility

IOLZX vs. FTQGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ICON Equity Fund (IOLZX) is 7.17%, while Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) has a volatility of 8.87%. This indicates that IOLZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IOLZXFTQGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.17%

8.87%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.88%

16.95%

-1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.60%

21.35%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.54%

21.95%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.43%

21.72%

+0.71%

IOLZX vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOLZX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQGX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

IOLZX vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison

IOLZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.17%, less than FTQGX's 9.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
9.40%12.44%9.94%0.61%7.96%13.53%11.41%5.07%14.71%5.89%1.08%5.91%
IOLZX
ICON Equity Fund
8.17%10.69%22.21%4.75%18.57%14.12%0.00%3.46%1.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IOLZX and FTQGX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTQGX has higher volatility (8.87%) compared to IOLZX (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOLZX dropped -56.03% vs FTQGX's -61.29%.

IOLZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IOLZX and FTQGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer