IOFIX vs. BLV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

IOFIX (AlphaCentric Income Opportunities Fund) and BLV (Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF) are both funds - IOFIX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by AlphaCentric Funds, while BLV is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. Over the past 10 years, IOFIX returned 1.44%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for BLV. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IOFIX charges 1.65%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BLV.

Performance

IOFIX vs. BLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AlphaCentric Income Opportunities Fund (IOFIX) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOFIX achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than BLV's 0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, IOFIX has outperformed BLV with an annualized return of 1.44%, while BLV has yielded a comparatively lower 1.02% annualized return.

IOFIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -0.28%
• 6M: -0.54%
• 1Y: 7.15%
• 3Y*: 1.26%
• 5Y*: -3.14%
• 10Y*: 1.44%

BLV

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 0.59%
• 6M: -0.26%
• 1Y: 6.95%
• 3Y*: 2.13%
• 5Y*: -3.04%
• 10Y*: 1.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOFIX vs. BLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IOFIX AlphaCentric Income Opportunities Fund	-0.28%	8.34%	-0.35%	-5.52%	-21.68%	14.92%	-10.56%	11.93%	4.45%	14.04%
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF	0.59%	6.44%	-3.65%	7.35%	-26.95%	-2.89%	16.13%	18.99%	-4.17%	10.74%

Correlation

The correlation between IOFIX and BLV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.30

Over the past year, IOFIX and BLV have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

IOFIX vs. BLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOFIX

IOFIX Risk / Return Rank: 33
IOFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
IOFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
IOFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
IOFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
IOFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

BLV

BLV Risk / Return Rank: 23
BLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
BLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
BLV Omega Ratio Rank: 22
BLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
BLV Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOFIX vs. BLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaCentric Income Opportunities Fund (IOFIX) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IOFIX	BLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	0.86	+0.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	1.27	+1.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.15	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	1.09	+1.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.91	2.76	+4.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IOFIX vs. BLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the BLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOFIX and BLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IOFIX	BLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	0.86	+0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.66	-0.24	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	0.09	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.37	-0.18

Drawdowns

IOFIX vs. BLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOFIX drawdown since its inception was -45.49%, which is greater than BLV's maximum drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOFIX and BLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	IOFIX	BLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.49%	-38.29%	-7.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.98%	-5.73%	+2.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.74%	-15.16%	+5.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.50%	-36.27%	+5.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.49%	-38.29%	-7.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.68%	-23.91%	+3.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.76%	-9.51%	-2.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.99%	2.26%	-1.27%

Volatility

IOFIX vs. BLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AlphaCentric Income Opportunities Fund (IOFIX) is 1.32%, while Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) has a volatility of 2.57%. This indicates that IOFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IOFIX	BLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.32%	2.57%	-1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.04%	5.71%	-2.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.35%	8.17%	-3.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.80%	12.97%	-8.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.27%	11.99%	-2.72%

IOFIX vs. BLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOFIX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BLV's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

IOFIX vs. BLV - Dividend Comparison

IOFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.43%, more than BLV's 4.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF	4.79%	4.67%	5.09%	4.06%	4.17%	3.37%	6.12%	3.57%	4.07%	3.63%	4.16%	4.37%
IOFIX AlphaCentric Income Opportunities Fund	8.43%	7.44%	8.16%	7.52%	5.51%	3.94%	4.76%	4.70%	5.06%	4.83%	4.97%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IOFIX and BLV in my portfolio?

IOFIX and BLV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IOFIX or BLV?

BLV has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to IOFIX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOFIX dropped -45.49% vs BLV's -38.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IOFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.