INYY vs. OMAH

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

INYY (YieldMax INTC Option Income Strategy ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.43, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

INYY vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax INTC Option Income Strategy ETF (INYY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

INYY

• 1D: 1.63%
• 1M: -22.57%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 3.60%
• 6M: 10.27%
• YTD: 9.39%
• 1Y: 13.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INYY vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
INYY YieldMax INTC Option Income Strategy ETF	-12.32%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	3.88%

Correlation

The correlation between INYY and OMAH is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026	-0.43

Return for Risk

INYY vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 76
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 67
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INYY vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax INTC Option Income Strategy ETF (INYY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INYY	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.69	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.38	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.60	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.85	—

Drawdowns

INYY vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INYY drawdown since its inception was -27.35%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INYY and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	INYY	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.35%	-11.83%	-15.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.17%	-0.73%	-25.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.27%	-1.23%	-8.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INYY	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.61%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.74%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	78.39%	8.18%	+70.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	78.39%	12.85%	+65.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	78.39%	12.85%	+65.54%

Dividends

INYY vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

INYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.01%, less than OMAH's 14.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
INYY YieldMax INTC Option Income Strategy ETF	12.01%	0.00%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	14.91%	12.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INYY and OMAH in my portfolio?

INYY and OMAH have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INYY or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 14.91%, compared with 12.01% for INYY.

What is the main difference between INYY and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and VistaShares.