PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTL.L vs. KROP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INTL.L vs. KROP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc (KROP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

INTL.L is traded in GBp, while KROP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KROP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTL.L achieves a 34.85% return, which is significantly higher than KROP.L's 13.69% return.


INTL.L

1D
-3.03%
1M
-8.62%
6M
28.33%
YTD
34.85%
1Y
56.41%
3Y*
25.07%
5Y*
14.46%
10Y*

KROP.L

1D
-1.04%
1M
0.23%
6M
5.96%
YTD
13.69%
1Y
8.61%
3Y*
-2.12%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTL.L vs. KROP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
INTL.L
WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc
34.85%14.50%13.58%48.71%-27.07%
KROP.L
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc
13.69%-0.05%-6.73%-26.39%-15.16%

Correlation

The correlation between INTL.L and KROP.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between INTL.L and KROP.L has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTL.L vs. KROP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTL.L
INTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
INTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
INTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

KROP.L
KROP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
KROP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
KROP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTL.L vs. KROP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc (KROP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INTL.LKROP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.10

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

1.02

+2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.67

1.90

+8.77

INTL.L vs. KROP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the KROP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTL.L and KROP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INTL.L vs. KROP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTL.L drawdown since its inception was -37.71%, smaller than the maximum KROP.L drawdown of -50.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTL.L and KROP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTL.LKROP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.71%

-50.76%

+13.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.10%

-8.40%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.54%

-26.67%

-6.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.39%

-39.70%

+29.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.26%

-34.55%

+22.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

4.51%

+0.76%

Volatility

INTL.L vs. KROP.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) has a higher volatility of 12.44% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc (KROP.L) at 4.96%. This indicates that INTL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTL.LKROP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.44%

4.96%

+7.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.12%

13.30%

+9.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.70%

16.76%

+11.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.48%

20.22%

+9.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.44%

20.22%

+9.22%

INTL.L vs. KROP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTL.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

INTL.L vs. KROP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither INTL.L nor KROP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


INTL.L and KROP.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, INTL.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

INTL.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.L.

INTL.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while KROP.L tracks Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for INTL.L and 0.50% for KROP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTL.L and KROP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer