INTL.L vs. GGRP.L
INTL.L (WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and GGRP.L (WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD) are both exchange-traded funds - INTL.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while GGRP.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INTL.L returned 17.40%/yr vs 8.51%/yr for GGRP.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INTL.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for GGRP.L.
Performance
INTL.L vs. GGRP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTL.L achieves a 50.10% return, which is significantly higher than GGRP.L's 4.39% return.
INTL.L
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 25.51%
- YTD
- 50.10%
- 6M
- 51.64%
- 1Y
- 96.68%
- 3Y*
- 31.07%
- 5Y*
- 17.40%
- 10Y*
- —
GGRP.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- 4.39%
- 6M
- 5.22%
- 1Y
- 16.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.51%
- 10Y*
- —
INTL.L vs. GGRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTL.L WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 50.10% | 14.50% | 13.58% | 48.71% | -35.12% | 17.36% | 68.98% | 32.12% |
GGRP.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD | 4.39% | 7.06% | 9.85% | 11.62% | -3.21% | 20.07% | 13.17% | 26.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTL.L and GGRP.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2019 | 0.58 |
The correlation between INTL.L and GGRP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
INTL.L vs. GGRP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INTL.L
GGRP.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
INTL.L
GGRP.L
Communication Services
INTL.L
GGRP.L
Consumer Cyclical
INTL.L
GGRP.L
Healthcare
INTL.L
GGRP.L
Industrials
INTL.L
GGRP.L
Financial Services
INTL.L
GGRP.L
Consumer Defensive
INTL.L
GGRP.L
Basic Materials
INTL.L
-
GGRP.L
Energy
INTL.L
-
GGRP.L
Real Estate
INTL.L
-
GGRP.L
Utilities
INTL.L
-
GGRP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTL.L vs. GGRP.L — Risk / Return Rank
INTL.L
GGRP.L
INTL.L vs. GGRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INTL.L | GGRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.30 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.37 | 1.91 | +4.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.68 | 7.26 | +12.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INTL.L | GGRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85 | 1.61 | +2.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.71 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.89 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
INTL.L vs. GGRP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTL.L drawdown since its inception was -37.71%, which is greater than GGRP.L's maximum drawdown of -22.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTL.L and GGRP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTL.L | GGRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.71% | -22.60% | -15.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.10% | -8.59% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.54% | -16.46% | -17.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.92% | -16.46% | -20.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.02% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.00% | -2.93% | -8.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.90% | 2.26% | +2.64% |
Volatility
INTL.L vs. GGRP.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) has a higher volatility of 9.73% compared to WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L) at 3.02%. This indicates that INTL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTL.L | GGRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.73% | 3.02% | +6.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.45% | 8.06% | +10.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.03% | 10.18% | +14.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.61% | 12.07% | +13.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.29% | 15.36% | +10.93% |
INTL.L vs. GGRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
INTL.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GGRP.L's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
INTL.L vs. GGRP.L - Dividend Comparison
INTL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGRP.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.54% | 1.86% | 2.42% | 1.60% | 1.46% | 1.88% | 2.13% | 1.41% |
INTL.L WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INTL.L and GGRP.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GGRP.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GGRP.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for INTL.L.
INTL.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while GGRP.L is Global Equities. INTL.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while GGRP.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for INTL.L and 0.38% for GGRP.L.
Find the right allocation for INTL.L and GGRP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer