PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTL.L vs. DGIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INTL.L vs. DGIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) and iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc (DGIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTL.L achieves a 44.04% return, which is significantly higher than DGIT.L's -0.49% return.


INTL.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
5.91%
YTD
44.04%
6M
44.11%
1Y
75.51%
3Y*
30.37%
5Y*
15.49%
10Y*

DGIT.L

1D
1.25%
1M
1.03%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
-0.52%
1Y
-3.48%
3Y*
11.69%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTL.L vs. DGIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
INTL.L
WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc
44.04%14.50%13.58%48.71%-35.12%17.36%68.98%40.59%-27.33%
DGIT.L
iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc
-0.49%-2.47%24.03%25.52%-28.82%2.05%37.30%20.58%-7.54%

Correlation

The correlation between INTL.L and DGIT.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2018

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between INTL.L and DGIT.L has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

INTL.L vs. DGIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INTL.L
DGIT.L

Technology

80.6%
42.9%

Communication Services

8.7%
19.6%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
16.0%

Healthcare

2.5%
0.1%

Industrials

2.0%
10.1%

Financial Services

1.0%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.6%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

5.8%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

INTL.L
80.6%
DGIT.L
42.9%

Communication Services

INTL.L
8.7%
DGIT.L
19.6%

Consumer Cyclical

INTL.L
4.6%
DGIT.L
16.0%

Healthcare

INTL.L
2.5%
DGIT.L
0.1%

Industrials

INTL.L
2.0%
DGIT.L
10.1%

Financial Services

INTL.L
1.0%
DGIT.L
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

INTL.L
0.6%
DGIT.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

INTL.L

-

DGIT.L

-

Energy

INTL.L

-

DGIT.L

-

Real Estate

INTL.L

-

DGIT.L
5.8%

Utilities

INTL.L

-

DGIT.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTL.L vs. DGIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTL.L
INTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
INTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
INTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DGIT.L
DGIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
DGIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
DGIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTL.L vs. DGIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) and iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc (DGIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INTL.LDGIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

0.98

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.97

-0.15

+5.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.92

-0.32

+15.24

INTL.L vs. DGIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the DGIT.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTL.L and DGIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INTL.L vs. DGIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTL.L drawdown since its inception was -37.71%, roughly equal to the maximum DGIT.L drawdown of -37.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTL.L and DGIT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTL.LDGIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.71%

-37.95%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.10%

-22.83%

+7.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.54%

-24.88%

-8.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.92%

-37.95%

+1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.20%

-11.22%

+7.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.31%

-13.47%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

10.69%

-5.64%

Volatility

INTL.L vs. DGIT.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) has a higher volatility of 11.43% compared to iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc (DGIT.L) at 5.81%. This indicates that INTL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTL.LDGIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.43%

5.81%

+5.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.54%

13.66%

+6.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.67%

16.63%

+10.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.08%

23.68%

+5.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.27%

22.95%

+6.32%

INTL.L vs. DGIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both INTL.L and DGIT.L have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

INTL.L vs. DGIT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither INTL.L nor DGIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


INTL.L and DGIT.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

INTL.L and DGIT.L have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTL.L and DGIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer