INSAX vs. MLXIX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

INSAX (Catalyst Insider Buying Fund) and MLXIX (Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund) are both mutual funds - INSAX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds, while MLXIX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, INSAX returned 7.83%/yr vs 11.11%/yr for MLXIX. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INSAX charges 1.53%/yr vs 1.43%/yr for MLXIX.

Performance

INSAX vs. MLXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst Insider Buying Fund (INSAX) and Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INSAX achieves a 13.67% return, which is significantly lower than MLXIX's 29.37% return. Over the past 10 years, INSAX has underperformed MLXIX with an annualized return of 7.83%, while MLXIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.11% annualized return.

INSAX

• 1D: -1.89%
• 1M: 5.42%
• YTD: 13.67%
• 6M: 11.45%
• 1Y: 19.05%
• 3Y*: 24.44%
• 5Y*: 2.63%
• 10Y*: 7.83%

MLXIX

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: -5.83%
• YTD: 29.37%
• 6M: 29.12%
• 1Y: 17.94%
• 3Y*: 23.61%
• 5Y*: 19.55%
• 10Y*: 11.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INSAX vs. MLXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INSAX Catalyst Insider Buying Fund	13.67%	15.39%	23.86%	31.44%	-32.65%	-17.65%	14.36%	23.91%	-2.91%	17.03%
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund	29.37%	-8.56%	45.26%	15.34%	27.02%	42.04%	-20.02%	12.05%	-18.48%	-13.83%

Correlation

The correlation between INSAX and MLXIX is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2014	0.34

The correlation between INSAX and MLXIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

INSAX vs. MLXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INSAX

INSAX Risk / Return Rank: 11
INSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
INSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
INSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
INSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
INSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

MLXIX

MLXIX Risk / Return Rank: 15
MLXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
MLXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
MLXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
MLXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
MLXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INSAX vs. MLXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Insider Buying Fund (INSAX) and Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INSAX	MLXIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	1.01	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	1.47	-0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.17	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	1.33	-0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.13	2.57	-0.44

INSAX vs. MLXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INSAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the MLXIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INSAX and MLXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INSAX vs. MLXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INSAX drawdown since its inception was -59.24%, smaller than the maximum MLXIX drawdown of -76.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INSAX and MLXIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	INSAX	MLXIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.24%	-76.78%	+17.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.44%	-15.44%	-8.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.44%	-22.14%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.26%	-22.14%	-35.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.24%	-72.63%	+13.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.09%	-7.27%	+3.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.79%	-23.12%	+9.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.47%	7.96%	+1.51%

Volatility

INSAX vs. MLXIX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst Insider Buying Fund (INSAX) has a higher volatility of 9.05% compared to Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) at 7.46%. This indicates that INSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INSAX	MLXIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.05%	7.46%	+1.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.32%	16.47%	+6.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.25%	20.51%	+7.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.99%	22.48%	+7.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.26%	28.13%	-1.87%

INSAX vs. MLXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

INSAX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than MLXIX's 1.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

INSAX vs. MLXIX - Dividend Comparison

INSAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.89%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INSAX Catalyst Insider Buying Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund	6.89%	8.26%	5.02%	6.67%	7.15%	8.26%	14.52%	15.93%	15.62%	11.37%	8.76%	11.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INSAX and MLXIX in my portfolio?

INSAX and MLXIX have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INSAX or MLXIX?

INSAX has higher volatility (9.05%) compared to MLXIX (7.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INSAX dropped -59.24% vs MLXIX's -76.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MLXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.