INRG.L vs. WNDG.L
INRG.L (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and WNDG.L (Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Energy Equities funds tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, from iShares and Global X respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, INRG.L returned 5.64%/yr vs -0.34%/yr for WNDG.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INRG.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for WNDG.L.
Performance
INRG.L vs. WNDG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
INRG.L is traded in GBp, while WNDG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the WNDG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INRG.L achieves a 39.09% return, which is significantly higher than WNDG.L's 16.77% return.
INRG.L
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 8.39%
- YTD
- 39.09%
- 6M
- 35.51%
- 1Y
- 82.63%
- 3Y*
- 5.64%
- 5Y*
- 2.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
WNDG.L
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -7.33%
- YTD
- 16.77%
- 6M
- 17.87%
- 1Y
- 43.50%
- 3Y*
- -0.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INRG.L vs. WNDG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 39.09% | 34.75% | -24.39% | -23.83% | 19.00% |
WNDG.L Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 16.77% | 23.53% | -18.76% | -23.82% | -3.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between INRG.L and WNDG.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022 | 0.62 |
The correlation between INRG.L and WNDG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INRG.L vs. WNDG.L — Risk / Return Rank
INRG.L
WNDG.L
INRG.L vs. WNDG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L) and Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WNDG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INRG.L | WNDG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.39 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.64 | 4.94 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.87 | 16.13 | +3.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INRG.L | WNDG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.42 | 2.23 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | -0.17 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
INRG.L vs. WNDG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INRG.L drawdown since its inception was -85.09%, which is greater than WNDG.L's maximum drawdown of -52.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRG.L and WNDG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INRG.L | WNDG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.09% | -52.03% | -33.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -8.76% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.29% | -39.56% | -4.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.35% | -21.30% | -6.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.54% | -28.82% | -27.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 2.69% | +1.46% |
Volatility
INRG.L vs. WNDG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L) has a higher volatility of 9.58% compared to Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WNDG.L) at 4.77%. This indicates that INRG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNDG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INRG.L | WNDG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.58% | 4.77% | +4.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.61% | 13.61% | +4.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.04% | 19.43% | +4.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.80% | 20.70% | +4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.33% | 20.70% | +4.63% |
INRG.L vs. WNDG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
INRG.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than WNDG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
INRG.L vs. WNDG.L - Dividend Comparison
INRG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, while WNDG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.09% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.00% | 0.62% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 2.05% | 3.68% | 3.69% | 3.65% | 3.90% |
WNDG.L Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INRG.L and WNDG.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WNDG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WNDG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INRG.L.
Both ETFs track S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for INRG.L and 0.50% for WNDG.L.
Find the right allocation for INRG.L and WNDG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer