INRG.L vs. ISUN.L
INRG.L (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and ISUN.L (Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - INRG.L tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD while ISUN.L tracks the MAC Global Solar Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, INRG.L returned 5.64%/yr vs -3.68%/yr for ISUN.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INRG.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for ISUN.L.
Performance
INRG.L vs. ISUN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
INRG.L is traded in GBp, while ISUN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISUN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with INRG.L having a 39.09% return and ISUN.L slightly higher at 40.49%.
INRG.L
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 8.39%
- YTD
- 39.09%
- 6M
- 35.51%
- 1Y
- 82.63%
- 3Y*
- 5.64%
- 5Y*
- 2.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
ISUN.L
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- 15.87%
- YTD
- 40.49%
- 6M
- 43.98%
- 1Y
- 108.55%
- 3Y*
- -3.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INRG.L vs. ISUN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 39.09% | 34.75% | -24.39% | -23.83% | 5.52% | -3.86% |
ISUN.L Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 40.49% | 35.32% | -35.78% | -29.74% | 1.40% | -4.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between INRG.L and ISUN.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2021 | 0.73 |
The correlation between INRG.L and ISUN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
INRG.L vs. ISUN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INRG.L
ISUN.L
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
INRG.L
ISUN.L
Industrials
INRG.L
ISUN.L
Energy
INRG.L
ISUN.L
Technology
INRG.L
ISUN.L
Basic Materials
INRG.L
ISUN.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
INRG.L
ISUN.L
-
Communication Services
INRG.L
-
ISUN.L
-
Consumer Defensive
INRG.L
-
ISUN.L
-
Financial Services
INRG.L
-
ISUN.L
Healthcare
INRG.L
-
ISUN.L
-
Real Estate
INRG.L
-
ISUN.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INRG.L vs. ISUN.L — Risk / Return Rank
INRG.L
ISUN.L
INRG.L vs. ISUN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L) and Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc (ISUN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INRG.L | ISUN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.46 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.64 | 9.16 | -2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.87 | 21.32 | -1.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INRG.L | ISUN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.42 | 3.19 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | -0.11 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
INRG.L vs. ISUN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INRG.L drawdown since its inception was -85.09%, which is greater than ISUN.L's maximum drawdown of -73.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRG.L and ISUN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INRG.L | ISUN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.09% | -73.48% | -11.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -11.78% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.29% | -64.82% | +20.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.35% | -32.49% | +5.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.54% | -42.69% | -13.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 5.07% | -0.92% |
Volatility
INRG.L vs. ISUN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L) is 9.58%, while Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc (ISUN.L) has a volatility of 13.16%. This indicates that INRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISUN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INRG.L | ISUN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.58% | 13.16% | -3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.61% | 23.45% | -5.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.04% | 33.87% | -9.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.80% | 40.53% | -15.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.33% | 40.53% | -15.20% |
INRG.L vs. ISUN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
INRG.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ISUN.L's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
INRG.L vs. ISUN.L - Dividend Comparison
INRG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, while ISUN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.09% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.00% | 0.62% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 2.05% | 3.68% | 3.69% | 3.65% | 3.90% |
ISUN.L Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INRG.L and ISUN.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, INRG.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
INRG.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for ISUN.L.
INRG.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while ISUN.L tracks MAC Global Solar Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for INRG.L and 0.69% for ISUN.L.
Find the right allocation for INRG.L and ISUN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer