INRG.L vs. EXH1.DE
INRG.L (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and EXH1.DE (iShares STOXX Europe 600 Oil & Gas UCITS ETF (DE)) are both Energy Equities funds from iShares - INRG.L tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD while EXH1.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Oil & Gas. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INRG.L returned 12.64%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for EXH1.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INRG.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for EXH1.DE.
Performance
INRG.L vs. EXH1.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
INRG.L is traded in GBp, while EXH1.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EXH1.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INRG.L achieves a 39.09% return, which is significantly higher than EXH1.DE's 31.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with INRG.L having a 12.64% annualized return and EXH1.DE not far behind at 12.34%.
INRG.L
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 8.39%
- YTD
- 39.09%
- 6M
- 35.51%
- 1Y
- 82.63%
- 3Y*
- 5.64%
- 5Y*
- 2.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
EXH1.DE
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -4.40%
- YTD
- 31.60%
- 6M
- 29.21%
- 1Y
- 59.83%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 19.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
INRG.L vs. EXH1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 39.09% | 34.75% | -24.39% | -23.83% | 5.52% | -23.71% | 135.23% | 39.22% | -2.66% | 10.46% |
EXH1.DE iShares STOXX Europe 600 Oil & Gas UCITS ETF (DE) | 31.60% | 33.75% | -7.44% | 5.46% | 36.39% | 12.14% | -17.39% | 5.47% | 0.07% | 6.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between INRG.L and EXH1.DE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2007 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between INRG.L and EXH1.DE has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INRG.L vs. EXH1.DE — Risk / Return Rank
INRG.L
EXH1.DE
INRG.L vs. EXH1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L) and iShares STOXX Europe 600 Oil & Gas UCITS ETF (DE) (EXH1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INRG.L | EXH1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.58 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.64 | 8.74 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.87 | 26.88 | -7.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INRG.L | EXH1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.42 | 3.29 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.91 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.52 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.24 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
INRG.L vs. EXH1.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INRG.L drawdown since its inception was -85.09%, which is greater than EXH1.DE's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRG.L and EXH1.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INRG.L | EXH1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.09% | -53.39% | -31.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -6.82% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.29% | -21.04% | -23.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.38% | -21.04% | -36.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.47% | -53.39% | -12.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.35% | -4.54% | -22.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.54% | -13.69% | -42.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 2.22% | +1.93% |
Volatility
INRG.L vs. EXH1.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L) has a higher volatility of 9.58% compared to iShares STOXX Europe 600 Oil & Gas UCITS ETF (DE) (EXH1.DE) at 5.72%. This indicates that INRG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXH1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INRG.L | EXH1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.58% | 5.72% | +3.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.61% | 14.56% | +3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.04% | 18.13% | +5.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.80% | 21.32% | +3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.33% | 23.60% | +1.73% |
INRG.L vs. EXH1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
INRG.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EXH1.DE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
INRG.L vs. EXH1.DE - Dividend Comparison
INRG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than EXH1.DE's 2.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXH1.DE iShares STOXX Europe 600 Oil & Gas UCITS ETF (DE) | 2.98% | 4.05% | 4.54% | 4.44% | 3.38% | 3.26% | 5.05% | 4.00% | 2.85% | 5.39% | 4.20% | 5.08% |
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.09% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.00% | 0.62% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 2.05% | 3.68% | 3.69% | 3.65% | 3.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INRG.L and EXH1.DE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EXH1.DE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EXH1.DE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INRG.L.
INRG.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while EXH1.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Oil & Gas. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for INRG.L and 0.47% for EXH1.DE.
Find the right allocation for INRG.L and EXH1.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer