INPAX vs. FFNAX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (INPAX) and Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A (FFNAX).
INPAX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on May 17, 2012. FFNAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 9, 2007.
Performance
INPAX vs. FFNAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
INPAX vs. FFNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INPAX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio | -1.90% | 13.33% | 9.26% | 9.53% | -8.71% | 12.96% | 5.72% | 15.82% | -3.60% | 11.57% |
FFNAX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A | -1.56% | 12.83% | 7.02% | 11.27% | -13.89% | 7.72% | 12.74% | 15.56% | -4.46% | 10.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INPAX achieves a -1.90% return, which is significantly lower than FFNAX's -1.56% return. Over the past 10 years, INPAX has outperformed FFNAX with an annualized return of 6.72%, while FFNAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.83% annualized return.
INPAX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- -1.90%
- 6M
- 0.13%
- 1Y
- 9.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- 6.72%
FFNAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 10.64%
- 3Y*
- 8.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- 5.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INPAX vs. FFNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
INPAX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than FFNAX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
INPAX vs. FFNAX — Risk / Return Rank
INPAX
FFNAX
INPAX vs. FFNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (INPAX) and Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A (FFNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INPAX | FFNAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 1.36 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 1.92 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.28 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 1.79 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.28 | 7.53 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INPAX | FFNAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 1.36 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.52 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.77 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.59 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between INPAX and FFNAX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
INPAX vs. FFNAX - Dividend Comparison
INPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than FFNAX's 3.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INPAX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio | 4.97% | 4.87% | 5.21% | 4.82% | 4.90% | 4.43% | 5.59% | 4.57% | 4.85% | 3.29% | 3.58% | 3.90% |
FFNAX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A | 3.74% | 3.69% | 2.54% | 2.20% | 5.40% | 2.06% | 2.08% | 3.37% | 4.21% | 2.32% | 1.21% | 2.88% |
Drawdowns
INPAX vs. FFNAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INPAX drawdown since its inception was -21.25%, smaller than the maximum FFNAX drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INPAX and FFNAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| INPAX | FFNAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.25% | -31.88% | +10.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.26% | -5.65% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.36% | -18.77% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.25% | -18.77% | -2.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.76% | -5.20% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -3.98% | +1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | 1.35% | +0.09% |
Volatility
INPAX vs. FFNAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (INPAX) is 2.72%, while Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Fund Class A (FFNAX) has a volatility of 3.00%. This indicates that INPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| INPAX | FFNAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | 3.00% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.58% | 4.90% | -0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.60% | 7.85% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 7.77% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.34% | 7.62% | +0.72% |