PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INOC.TO vs. ZCN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INOC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Inovestor Canadian Equity Index ETF (INOC.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with INOC.TO having a 11.06% return and ZCN.TO slightly lower at 10.54%.


INOC.TO

1D
0.42%
1M
3.00%
YTD
11.06%
6M
11.42%
1Y
22.87%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*

ZCN.TO

1D
-0.64%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
10.54%
6M
9.63%
1Y
32.92%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
14.61%
10Y*
12.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INOC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INOC.TO
Global X Inovestor Canadian Equity Index ETF
11.06%13.17%11.66%21.10%-5.66%21.14%1.62%25.41%-11.41%2.70%
ZCN.TO
BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
10.54%31.51%21.64%11.63%-5.84%25.05%5.69%22.85%-8.85%1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between INOC.TO and ZCN.TO is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2017

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between INOC.TO and ZCN.TO has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

INOC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INOC.TO
ZCN.TO

Basic Materials

18.6%
17.2%

Financial Services

15.7%
33.7%

Consumer Cyclical

15.2%
3.7%

Industrials

13.7%
10.2%

Energy

13.4%
18.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
2.9%

Technology

7.8%
6.7%

Healthcare

4.4%
0.1%

Real Estate

3.5%
1.5%

Communication Services

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

3.3%

Basic Materials

INOC.TO
18.6%
ZCN.TO
17.2%

Financial Services

INOC.TO
15.7%
ZCN.TO
33.7%

Consumer Cyclical

INOC.TO
15.2%
ZCN.TO
3.7%

Industrials

INOC.TO
13.7%
ZCN.TO
10.2%

Energy

INOC.TO
13.4%
ZCN.TO
18.9%

Consumer Defensive

INOC.TO
7.8%
ZCN.TO
2.9%

Technology

INOC.TO
7.8%
ZCN.TO
6.7%

Healthcare

INOC.TO
4.4%
ZCN.TO
0.1%

Real Estate

INOC.TO
3.5%
ZCN.TO
1.5%

Communication Services

INOC.TO

-

ZCN.TO
1.8%

Utilities

INOC.TO

-

ZCN.TO
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INOC.TO vs. ZCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INOC.TO
INOC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
INOC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INOC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
INOC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
INOC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
INOC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ZCN.TO
ZCN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ZCN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INOC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Inovestor Canadian Equity Index ETF (INOC.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INOC.TOZCN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.45

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.55

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.54

16.26

-7.72

INOC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INOC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the ZCN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INOC.TO and ZCN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INOC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INOC.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.65%, which is greater than ZCN.TO's maximum drawdown of -37.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INOC.TO and ZCN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INOC.TOZCN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.65%

-37.18%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

-9.30%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.07%

-12.25%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.53%

-16.25%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-1.89%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-4.72%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.03%

+0.66%

Volatility

INOC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Inovestor Canadian Equity Index ETF (INOC.TO) is 3.11%, while BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that INOC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZCN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INOC.TOZCN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

4.23%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

10.71%

-1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

13.13%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.40%

13.19%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

15.00%

+0.51%

INOC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

INOC.TO has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than ZCN.TO's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

INOC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Dividend Comparison

INOC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than ZCN.TO's 2.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INOC.TO
Global X Inovestor Canadian Equity Index ETF
1.16%1.66%1.61%2.04%1.82%1.81%2.03%1.89%2.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZCN.TO
BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
2.03%2.22%2.78%3.29%3.27%2.74%3.24%3.13%3.16%2.75%2.86%3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


INOC.TO and ZCN.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZCN.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for INOC.TO.

INOC.TO tracks Nasdaq Inovestor Canada Index, while ZCN.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for INOC.TO and 0.06% for ZCN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INOC.TO and ZCN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer