PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INMU vs. BINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

INMU vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

INMU vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
INMU
BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF
-0.03%5.52%2.77%4.76%
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
-0.50%7.57%5.76%7.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INMU achieves a -0.03% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's -0.50% return.


INMU

1D
0.21%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
-0.03%
6M
1.59%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
3.98%
5Y*
1.73%
10Y*

BINC

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
-0.50%
6M
0.74%
1Y
5.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


INMU vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

INMU has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

INMU vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INMU
INMU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
INMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
INMU Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
INMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
INMU Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

BINC
BINC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INMU vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INMUBINCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

1.79

-0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.37

2.36

-0.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

2.00

-0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.35

8.16

-2.82

INMU vs. BINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INMU Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the BINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INMU and BINC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INMUBINCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.79

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

2.32

-1.80

Correlation

The correlation between INMU and BINC is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

INMU vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

INMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than BINC's 5.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
INMU
BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF
3.13%3.48%3.47%3.44%1.92%1.14%
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
5.92%5.86%6.14%3.13%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

INMU vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INMU drawdown since its inception was -10.67%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INMU and BINC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


INMUBINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-2.69%

-7.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-2.69%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-1.87%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-0.33%

-2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.66%

+0.23%

Volatility

INMU vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) have volatilities of 1.25% and 1.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


INMUBINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

1.29%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.86%

1.72%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.34%

2.95%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.59%

3.03%

+0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.58%

3.03%

+0.55%