PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INFR.L vs. UTIL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INFR.L vs. UTIL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

INFR.L is traded in GBp, while UTIL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the UTIL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INFR.L achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly lower than UTIL.L's 12.15% return. Over the past 10 years, INFR.L has underperformed UTIL.L with an annualized return of 8.66%, while UTIL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.76% annualized return.


INFR.L

1D
-1.24%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
9.52%
6M
8.44%
1Y
16.29%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
8.66%

UTIL.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
12.15%
6M
12.96%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
16.76%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
11.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFR.L vs. UTIL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
9.52%5.90%11.49%-4.96%5.77%19.54%-4.70%20.82%4.39%5.41%
UTIL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF
12.15%41.15%-3.27%10.84%-1.95%1.85%18.14%21.99%4.37%13.97%

Correlation

The correlation between INFR.L and UTIL.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014

0.57

The correlation between INFR.L and UTIL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

INFR.L vs. UTIL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INFR.L
UTIL.L

Utilities

56.0%
95.4%

Industrials

20.8%
4.6%

Energy

16.4%

-

Real Estate

5.0%

-

Communication Services

1.0%

-

Technology

0.7%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

INFR.L
56.0%
UTIL.L
95.4%

Industrials

INFR.L
20.8%
UTIL.L
4.6%

Energy

INFR.L
16.4%
UTIL.L

-

Real Estate

INFR.L
5.0%
UTIL.L

-

Communication Services

INFR.L
1.0%
UTIL.L

-

Technology

INFR.L
0.7%
UTIL.L

-

Financial Services

INFR.L
0.0%
UTIL.L

-

Basic Materials

INFR.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

INFR.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Consumer Defensive

INFR.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Healthcare

INFR.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INFR.L vs. UTIL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFR.L
INFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
INFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
INFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

UTIL.L
UTIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFR.L vs. UTIL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INFR.LUTIL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

3.50

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.96

10.34

-2.39

INFR.L vs. UTIL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INFR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INFR.L and UTIL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INFR.LUTIL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.99

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.73

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.66

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.55

-0.04

Drawdowns

INFR.L vs. UTIL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFR.L drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, which is greater than UTIL.L's maximum drawdown of -28.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFR.L and UTIL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INFR.LUTIL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.25%

-28.73%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-8.58%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.08%

-12.60%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-19.90%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.75%

-28.73%

+1.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-5.73%

+2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.12%

-5.71%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

2.91%

-0.87%

Volatility

INFR.L vs. UTIL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) is 3.92%, while SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that INFR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTIL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INFR.LUTIL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

5.55%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

12.97%

-4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.49%

15.09%

-4.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.26%

16.35%

-4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.10%

17.82%

-3.72%

INFR.L vs. UTIL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFR.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than UTIL.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

INFR.L vs. UTIL.L - Dividend Comparison

INFR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, while UTIL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.82%2.97%2.96%3.02%2.54%2.60%2.84%2.70%2.99%3.51%3.45%4.75%
UTIL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INFR.L and UTIL.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UTIL.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UTIL.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.

INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index, while UTIL.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for INFR.L and 0.18% for UTIL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INFR.L and UTIL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer