INDY vs. MOAT
INDY (iShares India 50 ETF) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDY is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Nifty 50 Index, while MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INDY returned 6.65%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for MOAT. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INDY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.
Performance
INDY vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INDY achieves a -13.37% return, which is significantly lower than MOAT's -0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, INDY has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 6.65%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.47% annualized return.
INDY
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- -13.37%
- 6M
- -11.62%
- 1Y
- -12.55%
- 3Y*
- 1.97%
- 5Y*
- 1.75%
- 10Y*
- 6.65%
MOAT
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- 1Y
- 14.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
INDY vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDY iShares India 50 ETF | -13.37% | 4.97% | 3.47% | 16.88% | -7.31% | 19.43% | 10.01% | 9.99% | -4.32% | 36.15% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -0.66% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 24.12% | 14.84% | 34.79% | -1.28% | 23.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDY and MOAT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012 | 0.50 |
The correlation between INDY and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
INDY vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INDY
MOAT
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
INDY
MOAT
Consumer Cyclical
INDY
MOAT
Energy
INDY
MOAT
-
Technology
INDY
MOAT
Industrials
INDY
MOAT
Basic Materials
INDY
MOAT
-
Consumer Defensive
INDY
MOAT
Communication Services
INDY
MOAT
Healthcare
INDY
MOAT
Utilities
INDY
MOAT
-
Real Estate
INDY
-
MOAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDY vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank
INDY
MOAT
INDY vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares India 50 ETF (INDY) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INDY | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.16 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 1.02 | -1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | 3.11 | -4.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INDY vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDY drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDY and MOAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDY | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.74% | -33.31% | -11.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.95% | -12.43% | -6.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.40% | -21.44% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.40% | -23.96% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.50% | -33.31% | -10.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.12% | -4.45% | -14.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -3.83% | -8.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.72% | 4.06% | +4.66% |
Volatility
INDY vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
iShares India 50 ETF (INDY) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) have volatilities of 3.98% and 4.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDY | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 4.13% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 9.90% | +2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.31% | 13.93% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 18.20% | -3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 18.68% | +0.90% |
INDY vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDY vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
INDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than MOAT's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDY iShares India 50 ETF | 9.36% | 8.11% | 0.24% | 0.38% | 3.75% | 7.12% | 0.08% | 0.58% | 0.55% | 0.27% | 0.48% | 0.57% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.36% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDY and MOAT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOAT has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to INDY (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDY dropped -44.74% vs MOAT's -33.31%.
On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.47% vs 6.65% for INDY. On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, INDY has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.47% return vs 6.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INDY.
INDY has the higher dividend yield at 9.36%, compared with 1.36% for MOAT.
INDY is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. INDY tracks Nifty 50 Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for INDY and 0.47% for MOAT.
MOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INDY and MOAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer