INDS vs. FFUT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

INDS (Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDS is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index, while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. INDS is passively managed, while FFUT is actively managed. Over the past year, INDS returned 12.98% vs 18.91% for FFUT. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. INDS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.

Performance

INDS vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with INDS having a 9.26% return and FFUT slightly lower at 9.23%.

INDS

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 9.26%
• 6M: 9.15%
• 1Y: 12.98%
• 3Y*: 5.44%
• 5Y*: 1.17%
• 10Y*: —

FFUT

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: 9.23%
• 6M: 9.36%
• 1Y: 18.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDS vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF	9.26%	2.77%
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	9.23%	8.58%

Correlation

The correlation between INDS and FFUT is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	-0.11

Return for Risk

INDS vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDS

INDS Risk / Return Rank: 23
INDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
INDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
INDS Omega Ratio Rank: 21
INDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
INDS Martin Ratio Rank: 25

FFUT

FFUT Risk / Return Rank: 64
FFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDS vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INDS	FFUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	1.69	-0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	2.42	-1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.33	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	4.77	-3.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.20	15.04	-11.84

INDS vs. FFUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDS Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the FFUT Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDS and FFUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INDS vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDS drawdown since its inception was -40.17%, which is greater than FFUT's maximum drawdown of -3.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDS and FFUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	INDS	FFUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.17%	-3.98%	-36.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.23%	-3.98%	-8.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.52%	-3.98%	-14.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.58%	-0.94%	-14.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.06%	1.26%	+2.80%

Volatility

INDS vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) at 2.92%. This indicates that INDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INDS	FFUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.91%	2.92%	+1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.51%	8.96%	+3.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.59%	11.23%	+5.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.17%	11.03%	+9.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.08%	11.03%	+12.05%

INDS vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

INDS vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

INDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than FFUT's 1.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.91%	2.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF	3.39%	3.70%	3.75%	3.11%	2.63%	1.24%	1.68%	2.26%	1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INDS and FFUT in my portfolio?

INDS and FFUT have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INDS or FFUT?

INDS has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to FFUT (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDS dropped -40.17% vs FFUT's -3.98%.

Which ETF is better, INDS or FFUT?

On 1-year performance, FFUT leads with 18.91% vs 12.98% for INDS. On fees, INDS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FFUT has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INDS or FFUT?

Over the 1-year period, FFUT has performed better with a 18.91% return vs 12.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INDS or FFUT?

INDS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INDS or FFUT?

INDS has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 1.91% for FFUT.

What is the main difference between INDS and FFUT?

INDS is categorized as REIT, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for INDS and 0.80% for FFUT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.