PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDS vs. DRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDS vs. DRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) and Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDS achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly lower than DRN's 30.45% return.


INDS

1D
0.39%
1M
0.98%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.40%
1Y
15.25%
3Y*
5.42%
5Y*
1.31%
10Y*

DRN

1D
0.73%
1M
0.27%
YTD
30.45%
6M
29.39%
1Y
19.32%
3Y*
10.42%
5Y*
-10.46%
10Y*
-4.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDS vs. DRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
INDS
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF
10.90%7.78%-12.69%17.72%-32.68%54.61%12.62%42.25%-1.14%
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares
30.45%-11.24%-5.29%12.03%-67.26%152.94%-55.37%81.86%-8.04%

Correlation

The correlation between INDS and DRN is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018

0.86

The correlation between INDS and DRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDS vs. DRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDS
INDS Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
INDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDS Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
INDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDS Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

DRN
DRN Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
DRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRN Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
DRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRN Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDS vs. DRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) and Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INDSDRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.11

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

0.80

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.77

1.78

+1.98

INDS vs. DRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDS Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the DRN Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDS and DRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INDS vs. DRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDS drawdown since its inception was -40.17%, smaller than the maximum DRN drawdown of -86.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDS and DRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDSDRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.17%

-86.32%

+46.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-24.28%

+12.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.96%

-48.26%

+21.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.17%

-80.58%

+40.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.30%

-62.81%

+45.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-35.16%

+19.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

10.85%

-6.79%

Volatility

INDS vs. DRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) is 4.94%, while Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN) has a volatility of 15.91%. This indicates that INDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDSDRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

15.91%

-10.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

31.71%

-19.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

41.98%

-25.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.17%

56.85%

-36.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.06%

60.75%

-37.69%

INDS vs. DRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DRN's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

INDS vs. DRN - Dividend Comparison

INDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than DRN's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares
1.89%2.81%2.24%2.84%2.70%4.21%1.90%2.59%3.11%0.91%
INDS
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF
3.34%3.70%3.75%3.11%2.63%1.24%1.68%2.26%1.81%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INDS and DRN have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRN has higher volatility (15.91%) compared to INDS (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDS dropped -40.17% vs DRN's -86.32%.

On 5-year performance, INDS leads with 1.31% vs -10.46% for DRN. On fees, INDS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, INDS has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, INDS has performed better with a 1.31% return vs -10.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INDS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DRN.

INDS has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 1.89% for DRN.

INDS tracks Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index, while DRN tracks MSCI US REIT Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for INDS and 0.99% for DRN.

INDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDS and DRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer