PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDEX vs. RCKSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDEX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 (INDEX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDEX achieves a 9.65% return, which is significantly lower than RCKSX's 15.47% return. Over the past 10 years, INDEX has outperformed RCKSX with an annualized return of 13.29%, while RCKSX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.43% annualized return.


INDEX

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.11%
YTD
9.65%
6M
8.70%
1Y
25.41%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
11.53%
10Y*
13.29%

RCKSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
15.47%
6M
13.64%
1Y
20.17%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
11.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDEX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INDEX
CYBER HORNET S&P 500
9.65%17.77%24.73%10.58%-11.84%29.10%12.75%28.98%-7.83%18.70%
RCKSX
Rock Oak Core Growth Fund
15.47%12.99%15.12%15.57%-18.09%9.96%13.75%19.05%-2.14%22.69%

Correlation

The correlation between INDEX and RCKSX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2015

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between INDEX and RCKSX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDEX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDEX
INDEX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
INDEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
INDEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

RCKSX
RCKSX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
RCKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RCKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDEX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 (INDEX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INDEXRCKSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.31

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

5.35

-2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.57

14.75

-1.18

INDEX vs. RCKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the RCKSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDEX and RCKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INDEX vs. RCKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDEX drawdown since its inception was -38.82%, smaller than the maximum RCKSX drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDEX and RCKSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDEXRCKSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.82%

-57.88%

+19.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-4.14%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-18.22%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.52%

-22.54%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.82%

-33.10%

-5.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-0.46%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-9.48%

+4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.50%

+0.47%

Volatility

INDEX vs. RCKSX - Volatility Comparison

CYBER HORNET S&P 500 (INDEX) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) at 3.29%. This indicates that INDEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDEXRCKSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

3.29%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

8.07%

+1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.47%

11.75%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

15.64%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.69%

17.55%

+1.14%

INDEX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDEX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

INDEX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison

INDEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than RCKSX's 5.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INDEX
CYBER HORNET S&P 500
0.95%1.04%1.97%1.56%3.25%1.81%1.53%1.61%3.09%1.15%0.00%0.00%
RCKSX
Rock Oak Core Growth Fund
5.42%6.26%0.47%0.71%1.00%4.31%16.56%3.18%0.59%5.91%0.70%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


INDEX and RCKSX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INDEX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to RCKSX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDEX dropped -38.82% vs RCKSX's -57.88%.

INDEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDEX and RCKSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer