PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDE vs. EMSF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDE vs. EMSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews India Active ETF (INDE) and Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDE achieves a -8.87% return, which is significantly lower than EMSF's 45.34% return.


INDE

1D
-1.13%
1M
1.10%
YTD
-8.87%
6M
-8.36%
1Y
-5.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMSF

1D
-1.10%
1M
8.61%
YTD
45.34%
6M
40.08%
1Y
63.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDE vs. EMSF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
INDE
Matthews India Active ETF
-8.87%2.39%10.95%8.18%
EMSF
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF
45.34%19.20%-3.09%1.88%

Correlation

The correlation between INDE and EMSF is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2023

0.45

INDE vs. EMSF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INDE
EMSF

Financial Services

30.6%
16.6%

Consumer Cyclical

17.8%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

8.2%
3.9%

Healthcare

7.2%
6.8%

Industrials

7.1%
15.0%

Technology

6.9%
43.6%

Communication Services

3.4%
2.0%

Energy

3.4%

-

Basic Materials

3.0%

-

Real Estate

-

1.6%

Utilities

-

2.8%

Financial Services

INDE
30.6%
EMSF
16.6%

Consumer Cyclical

INDE
17.8%
EMSF
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

INDE
8.2%
EMSF
3.9%

Healthcare

INDE
7.2%
EMSF
6.8%

Industrials

INDE
7.1%
EMSF
15.0%

Technology

INDE
6.9%
EMSF
43.6%

Communication Services

INDE
3.4%
EMSF
2.0%

Energy

INDE
3.4%
EMSF

-

Basic Materials

INDE
3.0%
EMSF

-

Real Estate

INDE

-

EMSF
1.6%

Utilities

INDE

-

EMSF
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDE vs. EMSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDE
INDE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
INDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
INDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

EMSF
EMSF Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EMSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMSF Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EMSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMSF Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDE vs. EMSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews India Active ETF (INDE) and Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INDEEMSFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.30

2.51

-2.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.33

3.14

-3.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.43

-0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.26

4.37

-4.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.71

14.61

-15.32

INDE vs. EMSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDE Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the EMSF Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDE and EMSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INDEEMSFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

2.51

-2.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.98

-0.71

Drawdowns

INDE vs. EMSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDE drawdown since its inception was -22.89%, smaller than the maximum EMSF drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDE and EMSF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDEEMSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.89%

-24.75%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.10%

-14.57%

-4.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.61%

-1.10%

-14.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

-5.72%

-1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.13%

4.35%

+2.78%

Volatility

INDE vs. EMSF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews India Active ETF (INDE) is 6.75%, while Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) has a volatility of 9.96%. This indicates that INDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDEEMSFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

9.96%

-3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.33%

21.98%

-7.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.62%

25.35%

-8.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.51%

22.75%

-6.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.51%

22.75%

-6.24%

INDE vs. EMSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both INDE and EMSF have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

INDE vs. EMSF - Dividend Comparison

INDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than EMSF's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
EMSF
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF
1.30%1.88%3.29%0.02%
INDE
Matthews India Active ETF
1.93%1.75%0.56%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INDE and EMSF have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMSF has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to INDE (6.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDE dropped -22.89% vs EMSF's -24.75%.

On 1-year performance, EMSF leads with 63.33% vs -5.01% for INDE. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, INDE has been the lower-risk option at 6.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EMSF has performed better with a 63.33% return vs -5.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INDE and EMSF have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

INDE has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.30% for EMSF.

INDE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EMSF is Emerging Markets Diversified.

EMSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDE and EMSF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer