PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDAX vs. MVUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDAX vs. MVUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS/Kotak India ESG Fund (INDAX) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

INDAX is traded in USD, while MVUS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MVUS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDAX achieves a -10.69% return, which is significantly lower than MVUS.L's 1.93% return. Over the past 10 years, INDAX has underperformed MVUS.L with an annualized return of 7.47%, while MVUS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.25% annualized return.


INDAX

1D
0.64%
1M
3.20%
YTD
-10.69%
6M
-11.35%
1Y
-10.92%
3Y*
4.22%
5Y*
2.88%
10Y*
7.47%

MVUS.L

1D
-0.68%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
1.93%
6M
1.61%
1Y
10.08%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDAX vs. MVUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INDAX
ALPS/Kotak India ESG Fund
-10.69%2.03%10.94%16.77%-12.62%26.37%14.68%8.41%-12.51%39.77%
MVUS.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.93%11.72%18.70%9.31%-11.01%25.45%7.05%31.95%-6.00%16.33%

Correlation

The correlation between INDAX and MVUS.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012

0.28

INDAX vs. MVUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INDAX
MVUS.L

Financial Services

32.9%
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
6.9%

Industrials

10.4%
6.4%

Technology

8.7%
34.2%

Energy

7.2%
7.4%

Communication Services

7.2%
6.1%

Healthcare

5.8%
12.4%

Basic Materials

5.5%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
9.2%

Real Estate

1.3%
0.1%

Utilities

-

1.0%

Financial Services

INDAX
32.9%
MVUS.L
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

INDAX
14.8%
MVUS.L
6.9%

Industrials

INDAX
10.4%
MVUS.L
6.4%

Technology

INDAX
8.7%
MVUS.L
34.2%

Energy

INDAX
7.2%
MVUS.L
7.4%

Communication Services

INDAX
7.2%
MVUS.L
6.1%

Healthcare

INDAX
5.8%
MVUS.L
12.4%

Basic Materials

INDAX
5.5%
MVUS.L
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

INDAX
4.3%
MVUS.L
9.2%

Real Estate

INDAX
1.3%
MVUS.L
0.1%

Utilities

INDAX

-

MVUS.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDAX vs. MVUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDAX
INDAX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
INDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
INDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

MVUS.L
MVUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MVUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MVUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDAX vs. MVUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/Kotak India ESG Fund (INDAX) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INDAXMVUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.21

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

1.53

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.13

6.15

-7.28

INDAX vs. MVUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the MVUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDAX and MVUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INDAX vs. MVUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDAX drawdown since its inception was -43.98%, which is greater than MVUS.L's maximum drawdown of -38.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDAX and MVUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDAXMVUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.98%

-38.28%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.85%

-6.55%

-14.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.49%

-19.31%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.49%

-19.44%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.98%

-33.05%

-10.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.95%

-2.23%

-14.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.79%

-7.31%

-3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.59%

1.64%

+7.95%

Volatility

INDAX vs. MVUS.L - Volatility Comparison

ALPS/Kotak India ESG Fund (INDAX) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) at 2.49%. This indicates that INDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDAXMVUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

2.49%

+1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

6.15%

+6.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.85%

8.36%

+6.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.15%

18.88%

-3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

17.09%

-0.21%

INDAX vs. MVUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than MVUS.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

INDAX vs. MVUS.L - Dividend Comparison

INDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, while MVUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INDAX
ALPS/Kotak India ESG Fund
6.30%5.62%16.14%4.43%1.65%5.48%0.00%1.30%6.55%2.79%1.32%15.14%
MVUS.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INDAX and MVUS.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDAX and MVUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer