PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDA vs. TIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDA vs. TIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDA achieves a -10.58% return, which is significantly lower than TIP's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, INDA has outperformed TIP with an annualized return of 7.09%, while TIP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.


INDA

1D
1.13%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
-10.58%
6M
-9.05%
1Y
-10.57%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
7.09%

TIP

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.42%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*
2.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDA vs. TIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
-10.58%2.68%8.63%17.16%-8.94%21.36%14.83%6.49%-6.67%36.08%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
1.40%6.77%1.65%3.80%-12.26%5.68%10.84%8.35%-1.42%2.92%

Correlation

The correlation between INDA and TIP is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012

0.03

The correlation between INDA and TIP shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDA vs. TIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDA
INDA Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
INDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
INDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDA Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

TIP
TIP Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIP Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDA vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INDATIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.24

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

2.34

-2.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

7.00

-8.46

INDA vs. TIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDA Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the TIP Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDA and TIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INDA vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDA drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, which is greater than TIP's maximum drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDA and TIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDATIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.07%

-14.57%

-30.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.69%

-1.98%

-16.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.72%

-4.54%

-18.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.72%

-14.51%

-8.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.07%

-14.51%

-30.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.77%

-0.46%

-17.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.59%

-3.43%

-6.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.09%

0.66%

+7.43%

Volatility

INDA vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) at 1.03%. This indicates that INDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDATIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

1.03%

+3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

2.32%

+10.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.79%

3.39%

+11.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

6.21%

+9.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

5.74%

+15.37%

INDA vs. TIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than TIP's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

INDA vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison

INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
0.00%0.00%0.76%0.16%0.00%6.44%0.27%0.99%0.94%1.09%0.90%1.19%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
3.76%3.46%2.52%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


INDA and TIP have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INDA has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to TIP (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDA dropped -45.07% vs TIP's -14.57%.

On 10-year performance, INDA leads with 7.09% vs 2.53% for TIP. On fees, TIP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TIP has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, INDA has performed better with a 7.09% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TIP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for INDA.

TIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.

INDA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while TIP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. INDA tracks MSCI India Index, while TIP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for INDA and 0.18% for TIP.

TIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDA and TIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer