PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDA vs. PE500.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDA vs. PE500.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and Amundi ETF PEA S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (PE500.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

INDA is traded in USD, while PE500.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the PE500.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDA achieves a -10.58% return, which is significantly lower than PE500.PA's 8.56% return.


INDA

1D
1.13%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
-10.58%
6M
-9.05%
1Y
-10.57%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
7.09%

PE500.PA

1D
1.74%
1M
0.79%
YTD
8.56%
6M
9.88%
1Y
27.32%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDA vs. PE500.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
-10.58%2.68%8.63%17.16%-8.94%21.36%14.83%1.15%
PE500.PA
Amundi ETF PEA S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR
8.56%17.84%24.55%25.81%-19.35%30.95%17.47%11.59%

Correlation

The correlation between INDA and PE500.PA is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2019

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDA vs. PE500.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDA
INDA Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
INDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
INDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDA Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

PE500.PA
PE500.PA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PE500.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PE500.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PE500.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PE500.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PE500.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDA vs. PE500.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and Amundi ETF PEA S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (PE500.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INDAPE500.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.41

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

2.85

-3.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

12.23

-13.69

INDA vs. PE500.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDA Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the PE500.PA Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDA and PE500.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INDA vs. PE500.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDA drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, which is greater than PE500.PA's maximum drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDA and PE500.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDAPE500.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.07%

-34.26%

-10.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.69%

-9.45%

-9.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.72%

-20.52%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.72%

-24.42%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.77%

-1.07%

-16.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.59%

-5.33%

-4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.09%

2.21%

+5.88%

Volatility

INDA vs. PE500.PA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Amundi ETF PEA S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (PE500.PA) at 3.40%. This indicates that INDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PE500.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDAPE500.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

3.40%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

8.64%

+4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.79%

11.73%

+3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

15.96%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

17.61%

+3.50%

INDA vs. PE500.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than PE500.PA's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

INDA vs. PE500.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither INDA nor PE500.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
0.00%0.00%0.76%0.16%0.00%6.44%0.27%0.99%0.94%1.09%0.90%1.19%
PE500.PA
Amundi ETF PEA S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INDA and PE500.PA have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PE500.PA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PE500.PA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for INDA.

INDA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while PE500.PA is S&P 500. INDA tracks MSCI India Index, while PE500.PA tracks S&P 500 ESG+ Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for INDA and 0.25% for PE500.PA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDA and PE500.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer