PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDA.DE vs. QDVH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDA.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Dist (INDA.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDA.DE achieves a 7.47% return, which is significantly higher than QDVH.DE's -4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, INDA.DE has outperformed QDVH.DE with an annualized return of 13.89%, while QDVH.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.95% annualized return.


INDA.DE

1D
0.46%
1M
6.24%
YTD
7.47%
6M
14.62%
1Y
41.55%
3Y*
40.68%
5Y*
26.58%
10Y*
13.89%

QDVH.DE

1D
3.16%
1M
1.97%
YTD
-4.21%
6M
-1.74%
1Y
1.85%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
11.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDA.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INDA.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Dist
7.47%76.64%32.75%22.04%1.47%37.53%-23.78%15.32%-25.43%11.50%
QDVH.DE
iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
-4.21%3.01%37.13%8.44%-6.23%48.50%-12.20%35.41%-10.71%7.92%

Correlation

The correlation between INDA.DE and QDVH.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

0.54

The correlation between INDA.DE and QDVH.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDA.DE vs. QDVH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDA.DE
INDA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
INDA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
INDA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVH.DE
QDVH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
QDVH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDA.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Dist (INDA.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INDA.DEQDVH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.03

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

0.14

+2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.93

0.33

+8.60

INDA.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the QDVH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDA.DE and QDVH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INDA.DEQDVH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

0.13

+1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.18

0.49

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.57

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.48

-0.29

Drawdowns

INDA.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDA.DE drawdown since its inception was -70.13%, which is greater than QDVH.DE's maximum drawdown of -42.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDA.DE and QDVH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDA.DEQDVH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.13%

-42.39%

-27.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.59%

-12.76%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.38%

-21.72%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.77%

-21.72%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.08%

-42.39%

-12.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-9.46%

+7.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.50%

-7.90%

-18.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.64%

5.55%

-0.91%

Volatility

INDA.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Dist (INDA.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE) at 4.30%. This indicates that INDA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDA.DEQDVH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

4.30%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.92%

10.53%

+7.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.30%

14.63%

+7.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.05%

18.23%

+5.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.34%

20.90%

+5.44%

INDA.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVH.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

INDA.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Dividend Comparison

INDA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, while QDVH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
INDA.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Dist
5.05%5.42%5.93%1.58%5.04%3.76%1.42%4.45%4.56%
QDVH.DE
iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INDA.DE and QDVH.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVH.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVH.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for INDA.DE.

INDA.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Banks, while QDVH.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for INDA.DE and 0.15% for QDVH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDA.DE and QDVH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer